Saturday, May 19, 2018
Anxi-Semitism as opposed to Anti-Semitism? IDENTITY POLITICS FOR EVERYONE OR NO ONE
How about this? ANXI-Semitism as opposed to ANTI-Semitism.
Most sane people know that antisemitism, meaning knee-jerk hostility toward Jews, is wrong. But because of the promiscuous use of that term, even mild and sympathetic critics of Jews are often smeared with that term.
Maybe we need a new term: Anxi-Semitic. It would mean having ANXIETIES about jewish power and/or Jewish influence.
Anxi-Semitism would be ridiculous if Jews were weak and powerless. What would be the point of expending time and energy on examining and critiquing a people/community unless it had power and influence?
Precisely because Jews have lots of power in media-academia-finance-government-real-estate-entertainment-narrative-formation, it only seems natural to any sane and thinking person to have anxieties about the direction of Jewish power.
I mean... anyone who doesn't worry about Jewish influence in relation to Iran, Russia, and other parts and peoples of the world isn't being real about what's happening.
To address those worries and fears, we need a bit of Anxi-Semitism. We need to be ANXIOUS in order to prevent another Iraq War or some such.
Friday, May 18, 2018
Added Note to: Viktor Orban "While we serve the nation, our place is in Europe" and to UK's Diversity Propaganda
https://thehungaryjournal.com/2018/05/18/orban-while-we-serve-the-nation-our-place-is-in-europe/
The (((globalist))) media would have us believe that Orban and Hungary are about tyranny while the West is about 'liberal democracy'.
In fact, it's about Nationalism(sovereignty) versus Globalism(imperialism). The (((globalists))) are angry with Hungary for the same reason the British and the French were once angry, respectively, with Indians and Algerians. Indians and Algerians didn't want to live under imperialist domination. Globalism is the neo-imperialist hegemony by the West controlled by Jewish finance-capitalist gangsters and warmongers. How care Orban defy EU, far worse than USSR.
If indeed the West is about 'liberal democracy', why is it all about worshiping Jews and serving Israel, Israel, Israel? So much for colorblind universal application of justice. And why does globalism favor black faces(MLK and Mandela) as heroes while snubbing men like Arafat and Duterte? Globalism promotes three peoples above all others in the symbolic sweepstakes: Jews, blacks, and of course, homos. No one else need apply.
And because white gentiles have been morally discredited by PC, they ONLY way they can attain redemption and keep the privilege(and play the game of power) is by sucking up to Jews, blacks, and Homos, the Holy Three Icons of PC. So, we have white cucks of both Democratic and Republican Parties singing hosannas to Israel, Israel, Israel, or pontificating endlessly about Mandela and MLK. Or justifying US imperialist wars on grounds that lesbians and homos get to drop bombs on the 'bad guys' and spread 'gay pride' parades into every corner of the globe. John McCain got a lot of mileage out of sucking up to Jews. By invoking the specter of New Hitler and New Holocausts, he got to play the game of US warmongering. John Bolton and Samantha Powers feel justified in their positions and power because their 'white guilt' has been partially washed clean by their obeisance to Jews.
Globalism serves a far narrower core power-base than imperialism of old. In Classic Imperialism, the glory was shared by the imperialist elites and their national masses. So, if France conquered another part of the world, it meant greatness for French king/ruler and the French people. And the British masses felt collective pride in the Empire. Same with Japanese empire.
But the new globalist-empire serves only the special club of elites around the world. It is United Elites against all the peoples. So, the elites in the US, UK, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and etc all speak the same pod-people language when their privilege and wealth keep going up and up while the rest falls increasingly into oblivion. Globalist imperialism devised the Invade-Invite Strategy. The US, with support of its 'allies', gets to cook up excuses to invade or meddle in any part of the world, especially to serve Jewish interests because Jews control the West. It's no accident that the biggest conflicts between West and Rest all involve Jewish hatred. Jews hate Russia, Iran, Palestinians, Syrians, etc, so we must hate them too. It's that simple. But in exchange for the Rest being invaded or transformed by US cultural imperialism of Hollywood, Rap trash, and Homo propaganda, the Third World masses get to swamp the First World. So, the Rest gets militarily and financially swamped in exchange for the West being swamped by demographic imperialism. The Soros plan. Soros is no Eskimo.
Orban's plan is comparatively humble and modest. He respects the rights of other nations to protect borders and preserve cultures. On that basis, he believes the world can live in peace and trade and communicate as equals. But THAT is denounced as 'illiberal' by the globalist scum who gave us the destruction of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Ukraine, and the mass flooding of Europe by migrant-invaders.
--------------------
https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/996708052555399168
"WATCH | Do you know what the BBC are teaching your kids about mass immigration? Here is a video they made for 14-16 year old schoolkids. Apparently multiculturalism is "the only way to survive" & we need mass immigration because of grime music..."
Britain is not a free nation. It is under (((globalist))) domination that seeks to increase diversity so that a united people power against the elites is impossible. Britain is now owned by the Empire of Judea or EOJ, just like Ireland was once owned by the British Empire. Naturally, the Empire of Judea wants to increase Diversity and weaken the racial/cultural identity of the Native Population to shame, tame, and rein it in.
Imagine a hypothetical scenario: If the British Imperialists had filled up Ireland with tons of Diversity, there never would have been Irish independence. Imagine an Ireland that became 1/4 Irish, 1/4 African, 1/4 Muslim, and 1/4 Chinese under British domination. Such Diversity never could have united to overthrow British rule which could have played divide-and-rule forever. If anything, the non-Irish or 'New Irish'(Africans, Muslims, Asians) would have supported British hegemony because, after all, it had brought them to Ireland and given them a new life. The Irish, reduced to a minority in their own homeland, would have ended up like Native Hawaiians who are now pathetic tourist oddities in a lost homeland mostly owned by whites and Asians. Or like the natives of Latin America who still live under Hispanic imperialist tyranny because excessive diversity makes it impossible for the natives to unite as a people to overthrow the invaders.
But because (((globalists))) took hold of all media and academia, countless idiot masses have been fooled into thinking there is nothing more wonderful than their own nations being flooded with foreigners who, by the way, only arrive in huge numbers for MATERIAL reasons than for cultural or idealistic ones. Africans come to Ireland to leech off whitey and to hump white women. That's about it. They are not coming to appreciate the poetry of Yeats or the novels of Joyce.
Ironically, Great Britain and Ireland, which had once been so antagonistic, now have something in common: Both are totally owned, bribed, and/or brainwashed by the Empire of Judea. Both the elites and masses of UK and Ireland addicted to PC, Homo Worship, Diversity-mania, and Afromania(where Mandela is holier than local national heroes and where trashy black rappers are revered as prophets). They have no idea they are being played by the Jewish globalists. Ireland went from the frying pan into the fire. They managed to free themselves from the British Empire just to become a whore of an even bigger empire. Today, the Irish elites/masses and British elites/masses try to out-compete one another to show that they are MORE servile to (((globalism))). It's a dog-race. "We have a homo mayor", "we have a Muslim mayor", "Oh yeah? But WE have a homo governor", "But we have a homo prime minister... who is non-white to boot"...
Dogs competing to win plaudits and doggy-biscuits from the Soroses of the World.
The (((globalist))) media would have us believe that Orban and Hungary are about tyranny while the West is about 'liberal democracy'.
In fact, it's about Nationalism(sovereignty) versus Globalism(imperialism). The (((globalists))) are angry with Hungary for the same reason the British and the French were once angry, respectively, with Indians and Algerians. Indians and Algerians didn't want to live under imperialist domination. Globalism is the neo-imperialist hegemony by the West controlled by Jewish finance-capitalist gangsters and warmongers. How care Orban defy EU, far worse than USSR.
If indeed the West is about 'liberal democracy', why is it all about worshiping Jews and serving Israel, Israel, Israel? So much for colorblind universal application of justice. And why does globalism favor black faces(MLK and Mandela) as heroes while snubbing men like Arafat and Duterte? Globalism promotes three peoples above all others in the symbolic sweepstakes: Jews, blacks, and of course, homos. No one else need apply.
And because white gentiles have been morally discredited by PC, they ONLY way they can attain redemption and keep the privilege(and play the game of power) is by sucking up to Jews, blacks, and Homos, the Holy Three Icons of PC. So, we have white cucks of both Democratic and Republican Parties singing hosannas to Israel, Israel, Israel, or pontificating endlessly about Mandela and MLK. Or justifying US imperialist wars on grounds that lesbians and homos get to drop bombs on the 'bad guys' and spread 'gay pride' parades into every corner of the globe. John McCain got a lot of mileage out of sucking up to Jews. By invoking the specter of New Hitler and New Holocausts, he got to play the game of US warmongering. John Bolton and Samantha Powers feel justified in their positions and power because their 'white guilt' has been partially washed clean by their obeisance to Jews.
Globalism serves a far narrower core power-base than imperialism of old. In Classic Imperialism, the glory was shared by the imperialist elites and their national masses. So, if France conquered another part of the world, it meant greatness for French king/ruler and the French people. And the British masses felt collective pride in the Empire. Same with Japanese empire.
But the new globalist-empire serves only the special club of elites around the world. It is United Elites against all the peoples. So, the elites in the US, UK, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and etc all speak the same pod-people language when their privilege and wealth keep going up and up while the rest falls increasingly into oblivion. Globalist imperialism devised the Invade-Invite Strategy. The US, with support of its 'allies', gets to cook up excuses to invade or meddle in any part of the world, especially to serve Jewish interests because Jews control the West. It's no accident that the biggest conflicts between West and Rest all involve Jewish hatred. Jews hate Russia, Iran, Palestinians, Syrians, etc, so we must hate them too. It's that simple. But in exchange for the Rest being invaded or transformed by US cultural imperialism of Hollywood, Rap trash, and Homo propaganda, the Third World masses get to swamp the First World. So, the Rest gets militarily and financially swamped in exchange for the West being swamped by demographic imperialism. The Soros plan. Soros is no Eskimo.
Orban's plan is comparatively humble and modest. He respects the rights of other nations to protect borders and preserve cultures. On that basis, he believes the world can live in peace and trade and communicate as equals. But THAT is denounced as 'illiberal' by the globalist scum who gave us the destruction of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Ukraine, and the mass flooding of Europe by migrant-invaders.
--------------------
https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/996708052555399168
"WATCH | Do you know what the BBC are teaching your kids about mass immigration? Here is a video they made for 14-16 year old schoolkids. Apparently multiculturalism is "the only way to survive" & we need mass immigration because of grime music..."
Britain is not a free nation. It is under (((globalist))) domination that seeks to increase diversity so that a united people power against the elites is impossible. Britain is now owned by the Empire of Judea or EOJ, just like Ireland was once owned by the British Empire. Naturally, the Empire of Judea wants to increase Diversity and weaken the racial/cultural identity of the Native Population to shame, tame, and rein it in.
Imagine a hypothetical scenario: If the British Imperialists had filled up Ireland with tons of Diversity, there never would have been Irish independence. Imagine an Ireland that became 1/4 Irish, 1/4 African, 1/4 Muslim, and 1/4 Chinese under British domination. Such Diversity never could have united to overthrow British rule which could have played divide-and-rule forever. If anything, the non-Irish or 'New Irish'(Africans, Muslims, Asians) would have supported British hegemony because, after all, it had brought them to Ireland and given them a new life. The Irish, reduced to a minority in their own homeland, would have ended up like Native Hawaiians who are now pathetic tourist oddities in a lost homeland mostly owned by whites and Asians. Or like the natives of Latin America who still live under Hispanic imperialist tyranny because excessive diversity makes it impossible for the natives to unite as a people to overthrow the invaders.
But because (((globalists))) took hold of all media and academia, countless idiot masses have been fooled into thinking there is nothing more wonderful than their own nations being flooded with foreigners who, by the way, only arrive in huge numbers for MATERIAL reasons than for cultural or idealistic ones. Africans come to Ireland to leech off whitey and to hump white women. That's about it. They are not coming to appreciate the poetry of Yeats or the novels of Joyce.
Ironically, Great Britain and Ireland, which had once been so antagonistic, now have something in common: Both are totally owned, bribed, and/or brainwashed by the Empire of Judea. Both the elites and masses of UK and Ireland addicted to PC, Homo Worship, Diversity-mania, and Afromania(where Mandela is holier than local national heroes and where trashy black rappers are revered as prophets). They have no idea they are being played by the Jewish globalists. Ireland went from the frying pan into the fire. They managed to free themselves from the British Empire just to become a whore of an even bigger empire. Today, the Irish elites/masses and British elites/masses try to out-compete one another to show that they are MORE servile to (((globalism))). It's a dog-race. "We have a homo mayor", "we have a Muslim mayor", "Oh yeah? But WE have a homo governor", "But we have a homo prime minister... who is non-white to boot"...
Dogs competing to win plaudits and doggy-biscuits from the Soroses of the World.
Wednesday, May 9, 2018
11 Great Symphonies
Jean Sibelius: Symphony No. 5
Jean Sibelius: Symphony No. 7
Johannes Brahms: Symphony No. 4
Vasily Kalinnikov - Symphony No. 1
Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 8
Gustav Mahler: Symphony No. 5
Hector Berlioz: Harold in Italy
Antonin Dvorak: New World Symphony
Sergei Rachmaninoff: Symphony No. 2
Camille Saint-Saëns: Symphony No. 3
Richard Strauss - An Alpine Symphony
Jean Sibelius: Symphony No. 7
Johannes Brahms: Symphony No. 4
Vasily Kalinnikov - Symphony No. 1
Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 8
Gustav Mahler: Symphony No. 5
Hector Berlioz: Harold in Italy
Antonin Dvorak: New World Symphony
Sergei Rachmaninoff: Symphony No. 2
Camille Saint-Saëns: Symphony No. 3
Richard Strauss - An Alpine Symphony
Tuesday, May 8, 2018
A Response to "Warrior-Hero of the West: Erich Hartmann, the Blond Knight of Germany" by Karl Nemmersdorf
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/05/08/warrior-hero-of-the-west-erich-hartmann-the-blond-knight-of-germany/#comment-310285
“Yet, the way he performed his duty, with courage and honor—and deadly efficiency—made him the highest scoring ace in history and one of the genuine heroes of Western history. Erich Hartmann is a splendid example of the qualities peculiar to Western Faustian man, such as an acute sense of individuality, iron willpower, and utmost daring.”
Sheesh. So. The Occidental Observer is now a full-blown Neo-Nazi site? What a waste of potential. It's almost as if TOO wants to live up to the smear campaign level against it by ADL and SPLC. But then, if TOO is really has a hardon for Nazis, it's not much of smear campaign, is it, to call it a Neo-Nazi site?
Look, I understand that many men who fought for the Wehmrmacht had sterling qualities as soldiers. And I can’t blame the soldiers because soldiers of all nations were recruited, trained, and sent to battle. German soldiers were no different. From movies like DAS BOOT, STALINGRAD, and DOWNFALL, we can see lots of good men, tough warriors with the right stuff. And we know soldiers must do as they are told. US soldiers were no different. When ordered to incinerate entire cities in Germany, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam, they had no choice but to follow orders. Soldiers are drilled and trained to obey. Therefore, we can’t blame soldiers for national policy. They can only be judged by how they performed in the battlefield.
But soldiers like the one featured in the the Occidental Observer article also serve as a cautionary tale that small virtues are not enough for a morally just order. Courage, honor, loyalty, dedication, camaraderie, and toughness are good virtues to have. But those qualities don’t decide the destiny of a nation. They don't ask the big questions. When a nation is ruled by a pathological nut like Hitler, even the best of men in the military are used to invade other nations, drop bombs on civilians, and even commit mass genocide.
There were plenty of Good Men in the German military, Japanese military, US military, Soviet military, and etc. The movie ENEMY BELOW shows that your average German soldier or sailor was not a monster with horns sprouting from his head. He was likely a man of courage, honor, and patriotism willing to fight and die for his country. But lots of Germans with such virtues didn't prevent WWII, the mass destruction of Europe, and the tragic immolation of Germany. They were mindful of being dutiful and committed but mindless about the bigger picture of a nation, the future of which was to be decided to psychopaths.
In a complex world, especially if you’re a member of a powerful nation that can destroy weaker nations, you must ask… “What kind people at the top are making policy that will affect countless lives?” Too many Good Germans blindly trusted Hitler because he had charisma and could give spellbinding speeches. To be sure, Hitler did do some good things, that is before he decided to throw caution to the winds and trigger a world war. In the end, what a sick tragedy that SO MANY GOOD MEN were wasted in a terrible war ignited by a pathological egotistical lunatic whose grand vision was to invade Russia, wipe out tens of millions, and turn survivors into illiterate helots.
And of course, we have the same problem now in the US. Lots of US soldiers are good guys, men of virtue and honor. But did US soldiers have a choice when they were ordered to invade Iraq? Did they have agency and true moral understanding? No, they were fed lies by the Jew-run Media and Judeo-Nazi Neocon warmongers whose agenda was to goad stupid goyim into fighting and dying in Wars for Israel and the Empire of Judea.
Sadly, all those US soldiers, though possessed of small virtues, lacked a larger understanding of the world and failed to realize that they were just toy soldiers of pathological crazy Jews(the new hitlers) who now control America.
We can acknowledge the fact that there were courageous and honorable men who fought for Nazi Germany. But it is morally disingenuous to to discuss that reality without considering the larger context of how all those Good Men were manipulated and ultimately destroyed by a pathological lunatic in a war that came to consume 40 to 50 million European lives.
By the way, ‘Judeo-Nazis’ is apt because, while ‘Nazi’ in the historical sense refers to Germans of the 30s and WWII, it can mean any group that acts like ‘nazis’ in the generic sense.
Now, how did Nazis act? Imperialist, supremacist, contemptuous, murderous, genocidal, pathological, ruthless, devious. Then, any existing group that acts most like that are generic nazis.
Well, what power acts most like that today? Jewish supremacist power, of course. Even Haaretz used the term ‘Judeo-Nazi’ to describe certain kinds of Jews.
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-not-neo-nazis-judeo-nazis-1.5250205
Today, it is Jews who are most committed to spreading hatred all around the world. Jews use MSM, their ministry of propaganda, to spread HATE against Russians, Syrians, Iranians, Palestinians, and white gentiles. But even as Judeo-Nazis spit on the faces of white gentiles, they also order dumb goyim to fight and die in Wars for Israel.
Germans went crazy in WWII period. But Jews also need to look in the mirror and realize the sickness in their own souls. How ironic that Jews, who invoke the holocaust 24/7, have become the very supremacist scum that they've condemned for so long.
“Yet, the way he performed his duty, with courage and honor—and deadly efficiency—made him the highest scoring ace in history and one of the genuine heroes of Western history. Erich Hartmann is a splendid example of the qualities peculiar to Western Faustian man, such as an acute sense of individuality, iron willpower, and utmost daring.”
Sheesh. So. The Occidental Observer is now a full-blown Neo-Nazi site? What a waste of potential. It's almost as if TOO wants to live up to the smear campaign level against it by ADL and SPLC. But then, if TOO is really has a hardon for Nazis, it's not much of smear campaign, is it, to call it a Neo-Nazi site?
Look, I understand that many men who fought for the Wehmrmacht had sterling qualities as soldiers. And I can’t blame the soldiers because soldiers of all nations were recruited, trained, and sent to battle. German soldiers were no different. From movies like DAS BOOT, STALINGRAD, and DOWNFALL, we can see lots of good men, tough warriors with the right stuff. And we know soldiers must do as they are told. US soldiers were no different. When ordered to incinerate entire cities in Germany, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam, they had no choice but to follow orders. Soldiers are drilled and trained to obey. Therefore, we can’t blame soldiers for national policy. They can only be judged by how they performed in the battlefield.
But soldiers like the one featured in the the Occidental Observer article also serve as a cautionary tale that small virtues are not enough for a morally just order. Courage, honor, loyalty, dedication, camaraderie, and toughness are good virtues to have. But those qualities don’t decide the destiny of a nation. They don't ask the big questions. When a nation is ruled by a pathological nut like Hitler, even the best of men in the military are used to invade other nations, drop bombs on civilians, and even commit mass genocide.
There were plenty of Good Men in the German military, Japanese military, US military, Soviet military, and etc. The movie ENEMY BELOW shows that your average German soldier or sailor was not a monster with horns sprouting from his head. He was likely a man of courage, honor, and patriotism willing to fight and die for his country. But lots of Germans with such virtues didn't prevent WWII, the mass destruction of Europe, and the tragic immolation of Germany. They were mindful of being dutiful and committed but mindless about the bigger picture of a nation, the future of which was to be decided to psychopaths.
In a complex world, especially if you’re a member of a powerful nation that can destroy weaker nations, you must ask… “What kind people at the top are making policy that will affect countless lives?” Too many Good Germans blindly trusted Hitler because he had charisma and could give spellbinding speeches. To be sure, Hitler did do some good things, that is before he decided to throw caution to the winds and trigger a world war. In the end, what a sick tragedy that SO MANY GOOD MEN were wasted in a terrible war ignited by a pathological egotistical lunatic whose grand vision was to invade Russia, wipe out tens of millions, and turn survivors into illiterate helots.
And of course, we have the same problem now in the US. Lots of US soldiers are good guys, men of virtue and honor. But did US soldiers have a choice when they were ordered to invade Iraq? Did they have agency and true moral understanding? No, they were fed lies by the Jew-run Media and Judeo-Nazi Neocon warmongers whose agenda was to goad stupid goyim into fighting and dying in Wars for Israel and the Empire of Judea.
Sadly, all those US soldiers, though possessed of small virtues, lacked a larger understanding of the world and failed to realize that they were just toy soldiers of pathological crazy Jews(the new hitlers) who now control America.
We can acknowledge the fact that there were courageous and honorable men who fought for Nazi Germany. But it is morally disingenuous to to discuss that reality without considering the larger context of how all those Good Men were manipulated and ultimately destroyed by a pathological lunatic in a war that came to consume 40 to 50 million European lives.
By the way, ‘Judeo-Nazis’ is apt because, while ‘Nazi’ in the historical sense refers to Germans of the 30s and WWII, it can mean any group that acts like ‘nazis’ in the generic sense.
Now, how did Nazis act? Imperialist, supremacist, contemptuous, murderous, genocidal, pathological, ruthless, devious. Then, any existing group that acts most like that are generic nazis.
Well, what power acts most like that today? Jewish supremacist power, of course. Even Haaretz used the term ‘Judeo-Nazi’ to describe certain kinds of Jews.
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-not-neo-nazis-judeo-nazis-1.5250205
Today, it is Jews who are most committed to spreading hatred all around the world. Jews use MSM, their ministry of propaganda, to spread HATE against Russians, Syrians, Iranians, Palestinians, and white gentiles. But even as Judeo-Nazis spit on the faces of white gentiles, they also order dumb goyim to fight and die in Wars for Israel.
Germans went crazy in WWII period. But Jews also need to look in the mirror and realize the sickness in their own souls. How ironic that Jews, who invoke the holocaust 24/7, have become the very supremacist scum that they've condemned for so long.
Saturday, May 5, 2018
A Response to "Heritage Foundation Defends Facebook’s ‘Right’ to Censor, Will Oppose Regulation" on Breitbart
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/05/03/heritage-foundation-defends-facebooks-right-to-censor-will-oppose-regulation/
Heritage Foundation is so full of BS.
Now, the argument that Facebook can do as it pleases because it is a private company has merit... if it were consistently applied.
BUT, would Heritage Foundation argue in such manner IF Facebook were owned by Palestinian-Americans and banned Pro-Zionist pages and voices as 'hateful' to Arabs? Really?
Or suppose Twitter is owned by Iranian-Americans who detest Israel and Zionists. Suppose they ban AIPAC, ADL, and other pro-Zionist groups as 'hate groups'. Would Heritage Foundation support the right of Twitter to ban pro-Zionist voices?
Or suppose Youtube is owned by Chinese-Americans and they worked with pro-Chinese voices(even in China itself) to shut down critics of China as 'hateful'. And suppose pro-Tibetan voices are banned from Youtube also. Would Heritage foundation support that?
No, of course not.
Also, the so-called Liberals are total hypocrites. They've been saying forever that it was EVIL and ANTI-AMERICAN for the Red Scare and Anti-communists to have fired and blacklisted people suspected of being communists or communist-sympathizers because, after all, the Constitution protects people's civil liberties regardless of race, color, or creed.
CREED means ideology, belief, religion, or conviction.
But now, the Liberals are saying people should not be hired or they should be fired on the basis of creed alone. If their creed is 'hateful'(according to Judeo-Nazis and Homomaniacs who rule current America), they must be shut down. Examples of obvious truths censored by Twitter that takes from Judeo-Nazi organization ADL that supports Zionist tyranny over Palestinians:
And,Heritage Foundation, a cucky-wuck organization, says Facebook and other companies(owned by people of certain ethnic group) can ban people who advocate for white interests.
With a 'right' like that, who needs the left?
Worst of all is the sheer hypocrisy. The goal posts keep changing to favor one side. So, we are told that blacklisting communists and leftist radicals during the 'McCarthy Era' was so terrible because of 'Muh Constitution'. We've heard that narrative a million times from textbooks and PBS documentaries.
But when it comes to pro-white voices calling for white national liberation from PC tyranny and Jewish Supremacism, they must be fired, blacklisted, and shut down. And the Liberal Media are fully behind the silencing. But then, most of the media, like most internet platforms, are owned and controlled by Jews who are only 2% of the US population. (And Heritage Foundation relies on rich Jews and cuck-oligarchs for donations.)
But then, the very people who've denounced America of the 40s and 50s for anti-communist and anti-Soviet hysteria are now pushing the totally nonsensical paranoid hysteria about 'Russia Hacking'. These psychos are shameless. At the very least, the Soviet Union after WWII was a real empire with a radical ideology. In contrast, Russia today just wants peace and trade. So, why is anti-Russia hysteria worse than ever? Because Jews rule America and hate Russia because Russia won't play nice doggy to EOJ or Empire of Judea. It won't bend over to Homomania(a form of Satanic-Jewish-christianity) and won't let Jewish oligarchs totally own the place.
In truth, Jew-run Hollywood was always about blacklisting. Suppose any writer or director proposes an idea for a movie about the Nakba Pogroms of 1948 from the Palestinian POV. Or a movie about Charlottesville that shows what REALLY happened, i.e. Jewish mayor, black police chief, Deep State, and Big Media all conspired to shut down the event and railroad White National Liberationists who said NO to Jewish Supremacism.
I guarantee that person will never work in Hollywood again. The anti-communist era blacklisted lasted just several years. But anti-white and anti-Palestinian blacklisting in Hollywood go on forever.
Heritage Foundation is so full of BS.
Now, the argument that Facebook can do as it pleases because it is a private company has merit... if it were consistently applied.
BUT, would Heritage Foundation argue in such manner IF Facebook were owned by Palestinian-Americans and banned Pro-Zionist pages and voices as 'hateful' to Arabs? Really?
Or suppose Twitter is owned by Iranian-Americans who detest Israel and Zionists. Suppose they ban AIPAC, ADL, and other pro-Zionist groups as 'hate groups'. Would Heritage Foundation support the right of Twitter to ban pro-Zionist voices?
Or suppose Youtube is owned by Chinese-Americans and they worked with pro-Chinese voices(even in China itself) to shut down critics of China as 'hateful'. And suppose pro-Tibetan voices are banned from Youtube also. Would Heritage foundation support that?
No, of course not.
Also, the so-called Liberals are total hypocrites. They've been saying forever that it was EVIL and ANTI-AMERICAN for the Red Scare and Anti-communists to have fired and blacklisted people suspected of being communists or communist-sympathizers because, after all, the Constitution protects people's civil liberties regardless of race, color, or creed.
CREED means ideology, belief, religion, or conviction.
But now, the Liberals are saying people should not be hired or they should be fired on the basis of creed alone. If their creed is 'hateful'(according to Judeo-Nazis and Homomaniacs who rule current America), they must be shut down. Examples of obvious truths censored by Twitter that takes from Judeo-Nazi organization ADL that supports Zionist tyranny over Palestinians:
And,Heritage Foundation, a cucky-wuck organization, says Facebook and other companies(owned by people of certain ethnic group) can ban people who advocate for white interests.
With a 'right' like that, who needs the left?
Worst of all is the sheer hypocrisy. The goal posts keep changing to favor one side. So, we are told that blacklisting communists and leftist radicals during the 'McCarthy Era' was so terrible because of 'Muh Constitution'. We've heard that narrative a million times from textbooks and PBS documentaries.
But when it comes to pro-white voices calling for white national liberation from PC tyranny and Jewish Supremacism, they must be fired, blacklisted, and shut down. And the Liberal Media are fully behind the silencing. But then, most of the media, like most internet platforms, are owned and controlled by Jews who are only 2% of the US population. (And Heritage Foundation relies on rich Jews and cuck-oligarchs for donations.)
But then, the very people who've denounced America of the 40s and 50s for anti-communist and anti-Soviet hysteria are now pushing the totally nonsensical paranoid hysteria about 'Russia Hacking'. These psychos are shameless. At the very least, the Soviet Union after WWII was a real empire with a radical ideology. In contrast, Russia today just wants peace and trade. So, why is anti-Russia hysteria worse than ever? Because Jews rule America and hate Russia because Russia won't play nice doggy to EOJ or Empire of Judea. It won't bend over to Homomania(a form of Satanic-Jewish-christianity) and won't let Jewish oligarchs totally own the place.
In truth, Jew-run Hollywood was always about blacklisting. Suppose any writer or director proposes an idea for a movie about the Nakba Pogroms of 1948 from the Palestinian POV. Or a movie about Charlottesville that shows what REALLY happened, i.e. Jewish mayor, black police chief, Deep State, and Big Media all conspired to shut down the event and railroad White National Liberationists who said NO to Jewish Supremacism.
I guarantee that person will never work in Hollywood again. The anti-communist era blacklisted lasted just several years. But anti-white and anti-Palestinian blacklisting in Hollywood go on forever.
Friday, May 4, 2018
A Response to David Brooks' "The Future of the American Left"
http://www.unz.com/isteve/brooks-the-future-of-the-american-left/
"Not long ago, most of the American left tended to think transnationally — partly because problems like climate change are global, partly because it’s hard to regulate a global economy nation by nation, partly because progressives used to be psychologically averse to nationalism."
Funny, but it seems ‘free trade’ is transnational too, and it allowed rapid industrialization of China and India that led to so much additional green house gases. Maybe the global environment wouldn’t have been so polluted if not for transnational global capitalism.
Sierra Club used to be more mindful of immigration’s impact on environment. No longer. It got bribed into welcoming more mass invaders into the West.
Also, as Ross Perot pointed out, when US companies remained IN the US, they adhered to environmental regulations. When they moved to Mexico, Vietnam, or China, not so much if at all. They could pollute all they wanted.
"Tribalism is in the air, on the left as well as on the right."
As opposed to both parties saying WE LOVE ISRAEL AND WE HATE RUSSIA & IRAN BECAUSE JEWS HATE THEM?
Tribalism or nationalism is NOT a zero-sum game of ‘we get all, you get none’.
Maybe it is with Jews, and therefore, Brooks could be projecting his tribal supremacism onto others. After all, the Jewish way in the Middle East is ‘Jews get everything, Palestinians get nothing’. Or it’s a case of ‘Israel can have nukes and randomly attack its neighbors and be showered with billions in aid… but Iran, a nation with no nukes, must be sanctioned to death.’
Brooks’ tribe practices that kind of zero-sum tribalism.
But most peoples in the US don’t. Their tribalism is ‘negotiative’. And most of American tribalism was always like this. Take NY. It has had Italians, Jews, Irish, Poles, blacks, Germans, Greeks, and etc. They all had a sense of ethnic community, but they knew they had to get along with other groups. So, they negotiated. It was never about ‘We Italians get everything, and rest of yous get nothing’ or ‘We Irish take everything, and the rest of you starve.’
If any group tarnished the good name of negotiative tribalism, it was Jews because their agenda was ALL OF YOU MUST SERVE US. Jewish tribalism has been the most zero-sum.
For example, Greek Americans have Greek interests and use their political and economic clout to sway US government to favor Greek interests. Turkish-Americans do the same. All groups do this. But Greeks don’t make ALL OF US favor Greek interests over our own interests. Greeks do their thing, Irish do their thing, Turkish-Americans do their thing, and etc.
But Jews? All of us are made to sing must hosannas to Israel, all of us must worship Shoah(even though most of us had NOTHING to do with it), and all of us must despise and hate Palestinians. And if Jews decide to hate Russia and Iran, all of us must hate them too. What is MSM but Jewish-run Hate News against Russia, Iran, and White gentiles?
Someone should tell Brooks that his people need to practice negotiative tribalism than zero-sum tribalism. Even so-called Jewish Liberalism is just a weapon of Jewish Power. Jewish anti-tribalism is really just (((anti-tribalism))) that aims to boost Jewish tribalism be weakening gentile tribalism. Jonathan (((Weisman))) let the cat out of the bag when he explained that Open Borders policy is wonderful because it is especially good for Jewish global hegemony. Basically, he’s admitting that gentile national sovereignty must be tossed to serve Jewish globalist hegemony.
Another thing. Identity politics of Right and Left are utterly different. On the Right, it’s about loyalty to essential and real identity with history, roots, culture, and memory.
In contrast, leftist politics is about ideology than identity. Credo than Ethno. Marxism is an idea in the mind. Now, classes do exist in society, but they are far less fixed than race, ethnicity, or culture. Whether rich Greek or poor Greek, a Greek is Greek. But if a poor man becomes a rich man, his class has changed. In India, caste and ethnicity are almost synonymous but not in the West.
Still, at least Marxism addressed real social evils of the dark side of capitalism. Today’s ‘leftism’ is an inspid vanity circus about how homos and trannies must be celebrated, even worshiped(as proxy puppets of the Tribe). Some guy recently wrote in NYT that Marx was right, i.e. today’s SJW are still carrying the torch. No, if Marx turned out to be right, it is because capitalism did come to be dominated by disgusting oligarchic imperialists with no sense of limits or decency. Gayday is elite destruction of the true leftism of Mayday. Today's 'leftism' is like the Apple Campaign of 'Think Different'. It is corporate appropriation of everything to turn them into brands and logos. Today's 'Marx' is like a Che Guevara T-shirt. It is fake leftism invoked to push Homomania funded by Wall Street, Las Vegas, and Hollywood as a means to replace class politics with the cult of universal vanity and narcissism.
Also, much of leftist identity is really rightist. Black power, brown power, and etc are really forms of rightism.
They are about 'my people, my culture, my heritage'. They are particularist, not universalist.
They only happen to be allied with naive white gentile leftism. Likewise, Muslims in Europe are allied with secular leftists because the latter are more for Open Borders. Does that make Islam a ‘leftist’ ideology? No. It’s just about alliances… like Saudis are allied with the US. And let's not forget the 'intersectionality' of Nazi imperialism and Japanese imperialism against the intersectionality of Anglo-American Imperialism and Soviet Imperialism. Politics makes for odd bedfellows.
Furthermore, current Leftism values identity only in terms of its ‘victim’ value. Unless an identity can invoke iconic victimhood, it has no value in the eyes of the Left.
In contrast, identity has value simply for its roots, substance, and history on the Right. Whether Swedes or Poles are a ‘victim’ group or not, the Right believes their identity has value as a repository of history, culture, and sense of larger shared community.
Leftist identity is purely negativist. So, if a group can claim victimhood, its identity matters. But if the group loses its victim credentials, its identity must be deconstructed and impugned. Today's so-called Leftism is held together by Shared Hate. Jews maintain the Coalition by vilifying White Gentile 'cis-gender' Males as the source of All Evil. Without that Hate Hysteria, the current 'leftist' coalition will unravel overnight.
In contrast, rightist conception of identity has value regardless of political fashions or perceptions. Thus, is far richer and more meaningful. It’s not identity as mere virtue-signaling.
Also, rightist identity is largely a matter of Inheritance. You receive your identity, culture, and history from forebears and pass them down. In contrast, much of New Identity Politics on the 'left' is fantastic and faddish, especially with 'gender fluidity' that says a man with penis and balls is suddenly a 'woman' if he so chooses.
--------------------
Left needs to cross with the Right. And that is what Trumpism called for.
Left vs Right is the most toxic idea to come out of the French Revolution.
The proper way is Left and Right. That is the only intersectionality or convergence that really matters. Left without the Right is like a Crucifix with bar but no pole. Right without the Left is like a Crucifix with pole but no bar.
The radicals of the French Revolution failed because they were all leftist. Napoleon did much better by crossing left and right. FDR did this too with New Deal. The saner part of Hitler did the same before he went nuts with imperialist war fever.
Nationalism is the best socialism. When the elites are compelled to think nationally, they feel a sense of obligation to the people of the nation. If they think globally, they just dream of ‘new ____’(in the form of endless Mass Invaders) or spout off symbolic banalities about “it takes a village” without doing anything for anyone. After all, a man who takes care of his own kids is a better man than a man who claims to love ALL kids but does nothing for any of them, including his own.
"Not long ago, most of the American left tended to think transnationally — partly because problems like climate change are global, partly because it’s hard to regulate a global economy nation by nation, partly because progressives used to be psychologically averse to nationalism."
Funny, but it seems ‘free trade’ is transnational too, and it allowed rapid industrialization of China and India that led to so much additional green house gases. Maybe the global environment wouldn’t have been so polluted if not for transnational global capitalism.
Sierra Club used to be more mindful of immigration’s impact on environment. No longer. It got bribed into welcoming more mass invaders into the West.
Also, as Ross Perot pointed out, when US companies remained IN the US, they adhered to environmental regulations. When they moved to Mexico, Vietnam, or China, not so much if at all. They could pollute all they wanted.
"Tribalism is in the air, on the left as well as on the right."
As opposed to both parties saying WE LOVE ISRAEL AND WE HATE RUSSIA & IRAN BECAUSE JEWS HATE THEM?
Tribalism or nationalism is NOT a zero-sum game of ‘we get all, you get none’.
Maybe it is with Jews, and therefore, Brooks could be projecting his tribal supremacism onto others. After all, the Jewish way in the Middle East is ‘Jews get everything, Palestinians get nothing’. Or it’s a case of ‘Israel can have nukes and randomly attack its neighbors and be showered with billions in aid… but Iran, a nation with no nukes, must be sanctioned to death.’
Brooks’ tribe practices that kind of zero-sum tribalism.
But most peoples in the US don’t. Their tribalism is ‘negotiative’. And most of American tribalism was always like this. Take NY. It has had Italians, Jews, Irish, Poles, blacks, Germans, Greeks, and etc. They all had a sense of ethnic community, but they knew they had to get along with other groups. So, they negotiated. It was never about ‘We Italians get everything, and rest of yous get nothing’ or ‘We Irish take everything, and the rest of you starve.’
If any group tarnished the good name of negotiative tribalism, it was Jews because their agenda was ALL OF YOU MUST SERVE US. Jewish tribalism has been the most zero-sum.
For example, Greek Americans have Greek interests and use their political and economic clout to sway US government to favor Greek interests. Turkish-Americans do the same. All groups do this. But Greeks don’t make ALL OF US favor Greek interests over our own interests. Greeks do their thing, Irish do their thing, Turkish-Americans do their thing, and etc.
But Jews? All of us are made to sing must hosannas to Israel, all of us must worship Shoah(even though most of us had NOTHING to do with it), and all of us must despise and hate Palestinians. And if Jews decide to hate Russia and Iran, all of us must hate them too. What is MSM but Jewish-run Hate News against Russia, Iran, and White gentiles?
Someone should tell Brooks that his people need to practice negotiative tribalism than zero-sum tribalism. Even so-called Jewish Liberalism is just a weapon of Jewish Power. Jewish anti-tribalism is really just (((anti-tribalism))) that aims to boost Jewish tribalism be weakening gentile tribalism. Jonathan (((Weisman))) let the cat out of the bag when he explained that Open Borders policy is wonderful because it is especially good for Jewish global hegemony. Basically, he’s admitting that gentile national sovereignty must be tossed to serve Jewish globalist hegemony.
Another thing. Identity politics of Right and Left are utterly different. On the Right, it’s about loyalty to essential and real identity with history, roots, culture, and memory.
In contrast, leftist politics is about ideology than identity. Credo than Ethno. Marxism is an idea in the mind. Now, classes do exist in society, but they are far less fixed than race, ethnicity, or culture. Whether rich Greek or poor Greek, a Greek is Greek. But if a poor man becomes a rich man, his class has changed. In India, caste and ethnicity are almost synonymous but not in the West.
Still, at least Marxism addressed real social evils of the dark side of capitalism. Today’s ‘leftism’ is an inspid vanity circus about how homos and trannies must be celebrated, even worshiped(as proxy puppets of the Tribe). Some guy recently wrote in NYT that Marx was right, i.e. today’s SJW are still carrying the torch. No, if Marx turned out to be right, it is because capitalism did come to be dominated by disgusting oligarchic imperialists with no sense of limits or decency. Gayday is elite destruction of the true leftism of Mayday. Today's 'leftism' is like the Apple Campaign of 'Think Different'. It is corporate appropriation of everything to turn them into brands and logos. Today's 'Marx' is like a Che Guevara T-shirt. It is fake leftism invoked to push Homomania funded by Wall Street, Las Vegas, and Hollywood as a means to replace class politics with the cult of universal vanity and narcissism.
Also, much of leftist identity is really rightist. Black power, brown power, and etc are really forms of rightism.
They are about 'my people, my culture, my heritage'. They are particularist, not universalist.
They only happen to be allied with naive white gentile leftism. Likewise, Muslims in Europe are allied with secular leftists because the latter are more for Open Borders. Does that make Islam a ‘leftist’ ideology? No. It’s just about alliances… like Saudis are allied with the US. And let's not forget the 'intersectionality' of Nazi imperialism and Japanese imperialism against the intersectionality of Anglo-American Imperialism and Soviet Imperialism. Politics makes for odd bedfellows.
Furthermore, current Leftism values identity only in terms of its ‘victim’ value. Unless an identity can invoke iconic victimhood, it has no value in the eyes of the Left.
In contrast, identity has value simply for its roots, substance, and history on the Right. Whether Swedes or Poles are a ‘victim’ group or not, the Right believes their identity has value as a repository of history, culture, and sense of larger shared community.
Leftist identity is purely negativist. So, if a group can claim victimhood, its identity matters. But if the group loses its victim credentials, its identity must be deconstructed and impugned. Today's so-called Leftism is held together by Shared Hate. Jews maintain the Coalition by vilifying White Gentile 'cis-gender' Males as the source of All Evil. Without that Hate Hysteria, the current 'leftist' coalition will unravel overnight.
In contrast, rightist conception of identity has value regardless of political fashions or perceptions. Thus, is far richer and more meaningful. It’s not identity as mere virtue-signaling.
Also, rightist identity is largely a matter of Inheritance. You receive your identity, culture, and history from forebears and pass them down. In contrast, much of New Identity Politics on the 'left' is fantastic and faddish, especially with 'gender fluidity' that says a man with penis and balls is suddenly a 'woman' if he so chooses.
--------------------
Left needs to cross with the Right. And that is what Trumpism called for.
Left vs Right is the most toxic idea to come out of the French Revolution.
The proper way is Left and Right. That is the only intersectionality or convergence that really matters. Left without the Right is like a Crucifix with bar but no pole. Right without the Left is like a Crucifix with pole but no bar.
The radicals of the French Revolution failed because they were all leftist. Napoleon did much better by crossing left and right. FDR did this too with New Deal. The saner part of Hitler did the same before he went nuts with imperialist war fever.
Nationalism is the best socialism. When the elites are compelled to think nationally, they feel a sense of obligation to the people of the nation. If they think globally, they just dream of ‘new ____’(in the form of endless Mass Invaders) or spout off symbolic banalities about “it takes a village” without doing anything for anyone. After all, a man who takes care of his own kids is a better man than a man who claims to love ALL kids but does nothing for any of them, including his own.
Wednesday, May 2, 2018
A Response to (((Jonathan Weisman)))'s Judeo-Nazi Hegemonic Neo-Imperialism
http://www.unz.com/isteve/sailer-on-semitism-by-jonathan-weisman/
(((Jonathan Weisman))) says:
"The Jew flourishes when borders come down, when boundaries blur, when walls are destroyed, not erected…. Again, we see, national borders and walls, wherever they rise, tend to trap Jews, not liberate them."
So, why were Jews fleeing from the Nazis? Nazis broke down borders all across Europe. They could access France and the vast fields for Russia for several yrs. Hmmm, funny that open borders under Nazism were bad for Jews back then. Open Borders meant Open Season on Jews.
When Nazis were on the rise, it seems Jews were seeking sanctuary in nations with working borders against Germany.
The great irony.
Under Nazi Open Borders policy, Jews were desperately fleeing as refugees to other parts of the world.
Today, it's Zionist Hegemonic Open Borders policy, and millions of Arabs and Muslims have been uprooted by Wars for Israel and forced to flee their own homelands.
Israel certainly doesn't want Syria to regain border control and keep out foreign Jihadis. Zionists want Syria to remain invaded by foreign terrorists and US mercenary troops. US pretends to remain to fight ISIS but is really there to aid 'moderate rebels' and Kurds against the central government. Why? All because Jewish supremacists control US foreign policy and don't want Syria to recover and recoup as a rival of Israel as Lone regional superpower.
At the height of their power, Nazis were for open borders in Europe because it meant Nazi power could go ANYWHERE. Jews feared this the most. After all, Jews who fled Germany for France were praying that France defend its borders against the German pan-European empire.
The fact that Jews are now so enthusiastic about destroying borders in EU and nations like Syria is proof that they are the main imperialists and hegemonists around the world. Open Borders means invasion by Jewish Power in every corner of the globe.
Imperialists flourish with open borders because they get to invade and 'include'. China certainly includes Tibet, like Japan once included Manchuria and Taiwan.
Nationalists protect and exclude.
Imperialists invade and include.
Anti-Imperialists flourish with secure borders because they can stop invasion and forcible inclusion by the world order. Palestine as a nation would still exist if Arabs had had the means to secure their borders and stop Zionist invasion that came to include Palestine as part of Jewish Empire. Jewish immigration eventually turned into Nakba Pogroms, of which 2018 is the 70th anniversary(but we hear nothing from the Jewish-dominant media), that wiped Palestine off the map.
Jews were not always for open borders. Many Jews had hoped to remain in one city and put down roots. But they were expelled to OTHER PLACES because of ethnic conflicts. And in the case of Old Jerusalem, the Open Borders and Open Invasion Policy sure didn't do much for the Jewish kingdom-state... that was wiped off the map by the invasive-inclusive Romans just like Palestine was later wiped off the map in the 20th century. For much of history, Jewish movements weren't about free trade and opportunity but expulsion and exile.
Eventually, Jews came to appreciate Open Borders because they piggybacked on Western Imperialism. Under protection and reach of British Imperialism, Jews plied the opium trade in China that had been forced open, invaded, and carved up China along the coasts. Because Jewish power has become so synonymous with Western Imperialism(much of which was funded by Jewish capital) and now American Global hegemony(dominated by Wall Street, Harvard, Hollywood, and Pentagon), Jews seek to weaken every gentile nation to gain influence over them. When Russia was opened up to US hegemony in the 90s, it was a grand opportunity for globalist Jews to gain control of policy and totally loot the place.
Also, Iraqi, Libyan, and Syrian borders were destabilized so that Jewish-controlled Foreign Policy could invade and weaken them for the interests of Israel. But these Jews who now call for the destruction of Iranian borders as well are always telling us that we must support and protect the ethnic integrity of Israel. I smell a weasel.
Imperialists and hegemonists want Open Borders. For Jews, this means financial, military, and cultural domination of all the world through Wall Street, Hollywood, Harvard, and Pentagon. And these Jews made a pact with Third World Demographic Imperialists who seek to invade white lands and leech off white wealth. Invade-Invite policy has adherents among Third Worlders. Consider the 'gold star dad' of Hillary's campaign. "You can threaten or invade my country militarily as long as you allow us to demographically invade your country." His family had access to the West, and his son, though Muslim, fought in an anti-Muslim war for the Empire of Judea, of which the US is the Jewel in the Crown. Fareed Zakaria and Nikki Haley are big adherents of this. Bomb Syria! And Let them in.
--------------------------
Ironically, the worst thing for Jews would be for white gentiles to listen to the advice of Jews: Whites should just forgo their white identity and join with rest of humanity and fight against privilege and hierarchy?
OKAY. The main targets will be Jews. Look at UK. Labour whites have given up white identity and joined with POC(people of color) against the Power. And Jews are freaking out because they got so much of it. In the UK, white 'progressives' and socialists side with Muslim immigrants who hate, hate, and hate Jewish-Zionist Power that pushes for Wars for Israel that have already killed over a million Muslims and turned so many into refugees. Jews feign sympathy for refugees but overlook the fact millions were forced into refugee-hood by Wars for Israel.
(((Weisman))) calls other people Nazis, but he is a Judeo-Nazi. Today, Jewish supremacists are the New Nazis.
US is not a democracy but an oligarchy ruled by Judeo-Nazis. Jews hate Trump not because he's a Nazi but because many of his statements were anti-Judeo-Nazi. Trump wants good relations with Russia. In contrast, Judeo-Nazis hate Russia just like Hitler hated Russia. Hitler wanted to take over Russia and reduce Slavs into slaves. Jewish power wants to take over Russia, spread Homomania, destroy Russian churches and values, and reduce Russians into deracinated consumer-slaves of Hollywood and Porn.
Trump called for end to Wars in the Middle East during the campaign. In contrast, Jews want more Wars for Israel. Crazy Netanyahu keeps bombing Syria and wants to drag US into a war with Iran. Indeed, one thing that Jews never criticize Trump for is his intermittent saber-rattling(mostly to APPEASE Judeo-Nazis) at Russia, Syria, and Iran. Judeo-Nazis want Trump to be warmongering, hostile, and chauvinist against any people or nation hated by Jews. After all, what is most of media but Judeo-Nazi hate campaign and propaganda against Russia, Iran, Syria, Palestinians(now gunned down at whim by Judeo-Nazis), and white gentiles.
Just ask yourself who the real nazis are. Richard Spencer or Jewish supremacists?
1. Who killed 500,000 Iraqi kids? Spencer or Jewish supremacist Albright?
2. Who guns down unarmed Palestinians who are living under apartheid in West Bank and Warsaw Ghetto-like conditions in Gaza? Spencer or the Judeo-Nazis of the IDF?
3. Who financially raped Russia in the 90s and reduced so many Slavic women as sex slaves in a vast white slavery ring? Spencer or Jewish globalists?
https://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/06/marc-rich.html
https://www.timesofisrael.com/thousands-of-slaves-in-israel-global-study-finds/
4. Who used Wall Street to rape Main Street in the bubble speculations under Clinton and Bush? Spencer or Jewish finance-capitalists?
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405
5. Who made all those Hollywood movies that dehumanized Arabs and Muslims as subhuman terrorists? Spencer or Jewish moguls?
6. Who keeps agitating for more hate, fear, paranoia, and hostility against Russia? Spencer or Jewish hegemonists?
7. Who recruited Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to pull off a Coup? Spencer or Jewish neo-imperialists?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mess-that-nuland-made-the-consequences-of-ukraines-regime-change/5462392
8. Who says Israel can have 200 nukes and receive endless aid from US while Iran is constantly threatened even though it has no nukes and allows inspections? Spencer or Jewish warmongers?
9. Who controls entertainment and pornified mainstream culture to the extent that your average girl in the US is raised to be a mindless slut consumer pig? Spencer or Jewish producers?
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/05/05/mind-pollution-the-promotion-of-sexual-perversion-on-national-tv-the-case-of-jenji-kohan/
10. Who controls Big Pharma that addicted so many white Americans to opoids just like David Sassoon the Jews addicted so many Chinese to opium? Spencer or Jewish oligarchs?
https://www.change.org/p/hold-the-sackler-family-and-purdue-pharma-accountable-for-the-opioid-crisis
11. Who monopolizes media and platforms and uses censorship and repression to control the flow of information because they cannot win a fair debate? Spence or Jewish tyrants?
12. Who holds AIPAC Nuremberg-like rallies to buy off whore gentile politicians to support Jewish supremacists interests over Palestinian national liberation aspirations in the Jewish-Palestinian conflict? Spencer or Jewish chauvinists? If Jews really are for equality, how come NYT won't hire Palestinian-American columnists? How come Jews insist that the US favor Jews over Palestinians just like Nazis favored 'Aryans' over Slavs?
It seems to me the real nazis of today are Judeo-Nazis. (((Weisman))) is just projecting his supremacist-imperialist-hegemonism on Trump and Spencer and other whites who want to respect the national sovereignty of other nations, serve their own national interest, and find ways for the world to get along on the basis that fences make for good neighbors.
Jews who are in neo-imperialist mode hate this for the same reason Hitler hated borders that prevented him access to other lands that he wanted to control for the sake of German supremacism. The real enemy of all of humanity is Judeo-Nazism.
Anyway, Weissman is to be thanked for letting the cat, or weasel, out of the bag.
He made it so plain as day what it’s all about.
-----------------------------
Weisman:
The borders were still blurred. Nationalism and chauvinism were in check. Undocumented immigrants marched in the streets of Washington and Los Angeles demanding rights. The polyglot nation recovered…. The Jew thrived.
Jews are what percentage of the world population? Yet, all the world must be turned upside down with mass invasion(of course Israel gets Passover rights) just to profiteth the Tribe?
Of course, Weisman's formula applies ONLY AS LONG AS Jews can play non-whites against whites in the game of Divide-and-Rule.
But what would happen if indeed ALL whites did go SJW? Then, they would side with POC against Zionism and Jewish privilege. BDS is spreading among SJW whites like wildfire.
So, it's a kind of paradox. In order for Jewish divide-and-rule strategy to work, there must always be 'racist' whites. If whites were to all lose their 'racism' and mix with POC and just become a polyglot people, they could all turn SJW. Then, Jews won't be able to play divide-and-rule among 'racist' whites and non-whites. The polyglot of POC and SJW whites will come after Jews... like the British Labour Party is a mix of Whites-gone-SJW teaming up with Muslims and Africans against Jewish power.
Also, it is the 'racist' whites who are most supportive of Israel as 'western outpost' in the Middle East. It is precisely because white conservatives have been tainted with 'white guilt' that they cling to Israel First to show that they'd been redeemed from 'antisemitism' and 'racism'. It's their get-out-of-white-guilt-jail card to prove that they are no longer 'racist' when, in fact, they still cling to whiteness, even if in an implicit way.
But if white conservatives really did lose their 'racism' and decided to become SJW, they'd no longer need to cling to Israel or profusely flatter Jews for moral credit. They could just hug Diversity to get all the moral cred they need.
Indeed, this is why proggy whites aren't so pro-Israel. As they are pro-POC, they don't need to hug Jews and Israel to be 'redeemed'. Just by screaming BLM or championing 'dreamers', their 'white guilt' gets cleansed.
In contrast, because white conservatives tends to be less charitable to blacks and browns, their 'white guilt' washing station remains Israel First. But if white conservatives were to drop their racial interests and embrace blacks, browns, and POC, then there would no longer be a need for them to worship Israel to ritual-cleansing of 'white guilt' as it would be washed constantly by their support of POC such as Muslims and Palestinians.
(((Jonathan Weisman))) says:
"The Jew flourishes when borders come down, when boundaries blur, when walls are destroyed, not erected…. Again, we see, national borders and walls, wherever they rise, tend to trap Jews, not liberate them."
So, why were Jews fleeing from the Nazis? Nazis broke down borders all across Europe. They could access France and the vast fields for Russia for several yrs. Hmmm, funny that open borders under Nazism were bad for Jews back then. Open Borders meant Open Season on Jews.
When Nazis were on the rise, it seems Jews were seeking sanctuary in nations with working borders against Germany.
The great irony.
Under Nazi Open Borders policy, Jews were desperately fleeing as refugees to other parts of the world.
Today, it's Zionist Hegemonic Open Borders policy, and millions of Arabs and Muslims have been uprooted by Wars for Israel and forced to flee their own homelands.
Israel certainly doesn't want Syria to regain border control and keep out foreign Jihadis. Zionists want Syria to remain invaded by foreign terrorists and US mercenary troops. US pretends to remain to fight ISIS but is really there to aid 'moderate rebels' and Kurds against the central government. Why? All because Jewish supremacists control US foreign policy and don't want Syria to recover and recoup as a rival of Israel as Lone regional superpower.
At the height of their power, Nazis were for open borders in Europe because it meant Nazi power could go ANYWHERE. Jews feared this the most. After all, Jews who fled Germany for France were praying that France defend its borders against the German pan-European empire.
The fact that Jews are now so enthusiastic about destroying borders in EU and nations like Syria is proof that they are the main imperialists and hegemonists around the world. Open Borders means invasion by Jewish Power in every corner of the globe.
Imperialists flourish with open borders because they get to invade and 'include'. China certainly includes Tibet, like Japan once included Manchuria and Taiwan.
Nationalists protect and exclude.
Imperialists invade and include.
Anti-Imperialists flourish with secure borders because they can stop invasion and forcible inclusion by the world order. Palestine as a nation would still exist if Arabs had had the means to secure their borders and stop Zionist invasion that came to include Palestine as part of Jewish Empire. Jewish immigration eventually turned into Nakba Pogroms, of which 2018 is the 70th anniversary(but we hear nothing from the Jewish-dominant media), that wiped Palestine off the map.
Jews were not always for open borders. Many Jews had hoped to remain in one city and put down roots. But they were expelled to OTHER PLACES because of ethnic conflicts. And in the case of Old Jerusalem, the Open Borders and Open Invasion Policy sure didn't do much for the Jewish kingdom-state... that was wiped off the map by the invasive-inclusive Romans just like Palestine was later wiped off the map in the 20th century. For much of history, Jewish movements weren't about free trade and opportunity but expulsion and exile.
Eventually, Jews came to appreciate Open Borders because they piggybacked on Western Imperialism. Under protection and reach of British Imperialism, Jews plied the opium trade in China that had been forced open, invaded, and carved up China along the coasts. Because Jewish power has become so synonymous with Western Imperialism(much of which was funded by Jewish capital) and now American Global hegemony(dominated by Wall Street, Harvard, Hollywood, and Pentagon), Jews seek to weaken every gentile nation to gain influence over them. When Russia was opened up to US hegemony in the 90s, it was a grand opportunity for globalist Jews to gain control of policy and totally loot the place.
Also, Iraqi, Libyan, and Syrian borders were destabilized so that Jewish-controlled Foreign Policy could invade and weaken them for the interests of Israel. But these Jews who now call for the destruction of Iranian borders as well are always telling us that we must support and protect the ethnic integrity of Israel. I smell a weasel.
Imperialists and hegemonists want Open Borders. For Jews, this means financial, military, and cultural domination of all the world through Wall Street, Hollywood, Harvard, and Pentagon. And these Jews made a pact with Third World Demographic Imperialists who seek to invade white lands and leech off white wealth. Invade-Invite policy has adherents among Third Worlders. Consider the 'gold star dad' of Hillary's campaign. "You can threaten or invade my country militarily as long as you allow us to demographically invade your country." His family had access to the West, and his son, though Muslim, fought in an anti-Muslim war for the Empire of Judea, of which the US is the Jewel in the Crown. Fareed Zakaria and Nikki Haley are big adherents of this. Bomb Syria! And Let them in.
--------------------------
Ironically, the worst thing for Jews would be for white gentiles to listen to the advice of Jews: Whites should just forgo their white identity and join with rest of humanity and fight against privilege and hierarchy?
OKAY. The main targets will be Jews. Look at UK. Labour whites have given up white identity and joined with POC(people of color) against the Power. And Jews are freaking out because they got so much of it. In the UK, white 'progressives' and socialists side with Muslim immigrants who hate, hate, and hate Jewish-Zionist Power that pushes for Wars for Israel that have already killed over a million Muslims and turned so many into refugees. Jews feign sympathy for refugees but overlook the fact millions were forced into refugee-hood by Wars for Israel.
(((Weisman))) calls other people Nazis, but he is a Judeo-Nazi. Today, Jewish supremacists are the New Nazis.
US is not a democracy but an oligarchy ruled by Judeo-Nazis. Jews hate Trump not because he's a Nazi but because many of his statements were anti-Judeo-Nazi. Trump wants good relations with Russia. In contrast, Judeo-Nazis hate Russia just like Hitler hated Russia. Hitler wanted to take over Russia and reduce Slavs into slaves. Jewish power wants to take over Russia, spread Homomania, destroy Russian churches and values, and reduce Russians into deracinated consumer-slaves of Hollywood and Porn.
Trump called for end to Wars in the Middle East during the campaign. In contrast, Jews want more Wars for Israel. Crazy Netanyahu keeps bombing Syria and wants to drag US into a war with Iran. Indeed, one thing that Jews never criticize Trump for is his intermittent saber-rattling(mostly to APPEASE Judeo-Nazis) at Russia, Syria, and Iran. Judeo-Nazis want Trump to be warmongering, hostile, and chauvinist against any people or nation hated by Jews. After all, what is most of media but Judeo-Nazi hate campaign and propaganda against Russia, Iran, Syria, Palestinians(now gunned down at whim by Judeo-Nazis), and white gentiles.
Just ask yourself who the real nazis are. Richard Spencer or Jewish supremacists?
1. Who killed 500,000 Iraqi kids? Spencer or Jewish supremacist Albright?
2. Who guns down unarmed Palestinians who are living under apartheid in West Bank and Warsaw Ghetto-like conditions in Gaza? Spencer or the Judeo-Nazis of the IDF?
3. Who financially raped Russia in the 90s and reduced so many Slavic women as sex slaves in a vast white slavery ring? Spencer or Jewish globalists?
https://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/06/marc-rich.html
https://www.timesofisrael.com/thousands-of-slaves-in-israel-global-study-finds/
4. Who used Wall Street to rape Main Street in the bubble speculations under Clinton and Bush? Spencer or Jewish finance-capitalists?
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405
5. Who made all those Hollywood movies that dehumanized Arabs and Muslims as subhuman terrorists? Spencer or Jewish moguls?
6. Who keeps agitating for more hate, fear, paranoia, and hostility against Russia? Spencer or Jewish hegemonists?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mess-that-nuland-made-the-consequences-of-ukraines-regime-change/5462392
8. Who says Israel can have 200 nukes and receive endless aid from US while Iran is constantly threatened even though it has no nukes and allows inspections? Spencer or Jewish warmongers?
9. Who controls entertainment and pornified mainstream culture to the extent that your average girl in the US is raised to be a mindless slut consumer pig? Spencer or Jewish producers?
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/05/05/mind-pollution-the-promotion-of-sexual-perversion-on-national-tv-the-case-of-jenji-kohan/
10. Who controls Big Pharma that addicted so many white Americans to opoids just like David Sassoon the Jews addicted so many Chinese to opium? Spencer or Jewish oligarchs?
https://www.change.org/p/hold-the-sackler-family-and-purdue-pharma-accountable-for-the-opioid-crisis
11. Who monopolizes media and platforms and uses censorship and repression to control the flow of information because they cannot win a fair debate? Spence or Jewish tyrants?
12. Who holds AIPAC Nuremberg-like rallies to buy off whore gentile politicians to support Jewish supremacists interests over Palestinian national liberation aspirations in the Jewish-Palestinian conflict? Spencer or Jewish chauvinists? If Jews really are for equality, how come NYT won't hire Palestinian-American columnists? How come Jews insist that the US favor Jews over Palestinians just like Nazis favored 'Aryans' over Slavs?
It seems to me the real nazis of today are Judeo-Nazis. (((Weisman))) is just projecting his supremacist-imperialist-hegemonism on Trump and Spencer and other whites who want to respect the national sovereignty of other nations, serve their own national interest, and find ways for the world to get along on the basis that fences make for good neighbors.
Jews who are in neo-imperialist mode hate this for the same reason Hitler hated borders that prevented him access to other lands that he wanted to control for the sake of German supremacism. The real enemy of all of humanity is Judeo-Nazism.
Anyway, Weissman is to be thanked for letting the cat, or weasel, out of the bag.
He made it so plain as day what it’s all about.
-----------------------------
Weisman:
The borders were still blurred. Nationalism and chauvinism were in check. Undocumented immigrants marched in the streets of Washington and Los Angeles demanding rights. The polyglot nation recovered…. The Jew thrived.
Jews are what percentage of the world population? Yet, all the world must be turned upside down with mass invasion(of course Israel gets Passover rights) just to profiteth the Tribe?
Of course, Weisman's formula applies ONLY AS LONG AS Jews can play non-whites against whites in the game of Divide-and-Rule.
But what would happen if indeed ALL whites did go SJW? Then, they would side with POC against Zionism and Jewish privilege. BDS is spreading among SJW whites like wildfire.
So, it's a kind of paradox. In order for Jewish divide-and-rule strategy to work, there must always be 'racist' whites. If whites were to all lose their 'racism' and mix with POC and just become a polyglot people, they could all turn SJW. Then, Jews won't be able to play divide-and-rule among 'racist' whites and non-whites. The polyglot of POC and SJW whites will come after Jews... like the British Labour Party is a mix of Whites-gone-SJW teaming up with Muslims and Africans against Jewish power.
Also, it is the 'racist' whites who are most supportive of Israel as 'western outpost' in the Middle East. It is precisely because white conservatives have been tainted with 'white guilt' that they cling to Israel First to show that they'd been redeemed from 'antisemitism' and 'racism'. It's their get-out-of-white-guilt-jail card to prove that they are no longer 'racist' when, in fact, they still cling to whiteness, even if in an implicit way.
But if white conservatives really did lose their 'racism' and decided to become SJW, they'd no longer need to cling to Israel or profusely flatter Jews for moral credit. They could just hug Diversity to get all the moral cred they need.
Indeed, this is why proggy whites aren't so pro-Israel. As they are pro-POC, they don't need to hug Jews and Israel to be 'redeemed'. Just by screaming BLM or championing 'dreamers', their 'white guilt' gets cleansed.
In contrast, because white conservatives tends to be less charitable to blacks and browns, their 'white guilt' washing station remains Israel First. But if white conservatives were to drop their racial interests and embrace blacks, browns, and POC, then there would no longer be a need for them to worship Israel to ritual-cleansing of 'white guilt' as it would be washed constantly by their support of POC such as Muslims and Palestinians.
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
50 Fave Songs Right Off the Top of Me Head
1. Year of the Cat - Al Stewart
2. I'll Never Find Another You - Seekers
3. Help Me - Joni Mitchell
4. Here and Now - Swing Out Sister
5. Ruby Tuesday - Rolling Stones
6. More than a Feeling - Boston
7. See Me Feel Me / Listening to You - The Who
8. Beyond the Sea - Bobby Darin
9. Proud Mary - CCR
10. Drive - Cars
11. And We Danced - Hooters
12. Tall Ships Go - Big Country
13. Box of Rain - Grateful Dead
14. Light My Fire - Doors
15. Don't Fear the Reaper - Blue Oyster Cult
16. Parole Parole - Dalida & Alain Delon
17. You'll Never Find - Lou Rawls
18. Thunder Road - Bruce Springsteen
19. The River - Bruce Springsteen
20. Boys Don't Cry - Cure
21. All the Love in the World - Outfield
22. Your Wildest Dreams - Moody Blues
23. Heat of the Moment - Asia
24. Welcome to the Boomtown - David & David
25. Look of Love - Dusty Springfield
26. Don't Worry Baby - Beach Boys
27. Linger - Cranberries
28. First of the Gang to Die - Morrissey
29. Do You Realize - Flaming Lips
30. Or Else - Cady Groves
31. I Shall Be Released - The Band
32. Insel meiner Angst - Hildegard Knef
33. Go West - Pet Shop Boys
34. Ai San San - Misora Hibari
35. Fotheringay - Fairport Convention
36. If You Want to Sing Out - Cat Stevens
37. Come on Eileen - Dexy's Midnight Runners
38. The Voice - Moody Blues
39. I Want You - Cheap Trick
40. I'm Not the One - Cars
41. Johnny Angel - Shelley Fabares
42. Superstar - Carpenters
43. How Can I be Sure? - Rascals
44. Teenage Idol - Ricky Nelson
45. Walk on By - Dionne Warwick
46. Rainy Night in Georgia - Brook Benton
47. Love Is All Around - Sonny Curtis
48. Our House - Madness
49. Stayin' Alive - Bee Gees
50. Car Wash - Rose Royce
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)