Commentary on Yasha Levine: "Racist Origins of Computer Technology". Jewishness is the Product of Supremacist Eugenics. Non-white Immigration is premised on White Supremacism as Non-whites prefer White-everything over their own kind.

https://www.unz.com/isteve/levine-the-racist-origins-of-computer-technology/

A century ago, America loved eugenics and was obsessed with protecting its “superior” Anglo-American stock from the threat of immigration. Out of this nativist vortex, the first computer was born.

Why do Jews always project their obsessions onto others? Yasha Levine bitches about 'eugenics' , but the very concept of Jewishness is based on eugenics. It's based on the Covenant, a conviction that God blessed Jewish blood uber alles. Unlike Christianity and Islam, which are matters of creed, Judaism is about God and Blood. It says Jews are special because of their blood and ancestry.

Furthermore, there's a theory that posits that higher Ashkenazi Jewish IQ is the result of breeding. Richest Jews married their daughters to the sons of the most renowned rabbis. Thus, business smarts were matched with scholarly smarts. Even Steven Pinker the Jew thinks there's something to the theory:

https://newrepublic.com/article/77727/groups-and-genes

As for immigration(hailed by Jews as the ultimate good) to the US(and other Anglo- and/or white-made nations), it's always been about White Supremacism, especially of the Anglo kind. First of all, waves of White Immigration to the US, Canada, and Australia spelled doom, often genocidal in impact(if not always of intent), of the native populations. (And of course, the Spanish & Portuguese wiped out 95% of natives in South America. Granted, that was more due to the spread of diseases than anything else.) At any rate, whites(Anglo and Latino) wanted the lands & resources and expelled native 'savages' whom they encountered on their path of relentless conquest. So, Mass Immigration was almost synonymous with 'genocide' in the New World.
And, what did Mass Immigration(of Zionist Jews) do to Palestine? By UN definition of genocide, the Zionist Project has to be recognized as genocide against Palestinians who were mass-expelled(aka ethnically cleansed) and culturally & historically erased from their historical homeland.
In the New World, Jewish merchants fully participated in the Immigration-Genocide of the Native Folks, aka the 'Red Man'(in North America) and Indigenous Browns(in South America). Key mega-bankers who funded Anglo-imperialism were Jewish. Rothchild Dynasty played a significant role in Anglo expansion into America and South Africa. And, the Jewish Sassoon family were the main pushers of opium on the Chinese, thus destroying millions of lives(just like the Jewish Sackler Clan silently quasi-'genocided' 100,000s of white working class folks[defamed by Jewish media as 'white trash' slated for Replacement] via opoiod addiction. Talk about mass eugenics!)

In the Western Frontier, Jewish merchants sold supplies, guns, and ammo to white settlers who were in the ruthless & relentless process of wiping out native Indians. Jews felt ZERO sympathy for American Indians, just like current Zionists regard Palestinians(and Arabs in general) as subhuman. Jews made no effort to stop waves of Immigration-'Genocide' to protect and preserve the remaining Indian community. Jews only cared about their own kind and fully supported the white supremacist immigration-'genocide' that led to Indians losing all their lands to whites, Jews, and immigrant-invaders. Emma Lazarus said "Gimme your huddled masses, wretched poor, etc." but the real people who were reduced to huddled wretched masses rotting in reservations were the American Indians. (The so-called 'huddled masses yearning to be free' had their own nations or places in the Old World of the 19th century. By arriving in America, they came to deny the 'right' to homeland for the indigenous folks.)
And look at all those huddled wretched masses in Gaza and West Bank. They sure do yearn to be free, but Jews say NO. Zionist Imperialism, the reigning ideology of US foreign policy, says all support and sympathy must go to Jewish invaders and NONE for Palestinians who were robbed of their homeland. In Gaza, IDF death squads mow down women and children. In West Bank, Palestinians face apartheid and face the looming threat of expulsion into Jordan or Syria. If indeed Donald Trump is 'Literally Hitler'(as so many Jews claim), he is most Hitlerian in support of Zionism and Jewish supremacist hatred and/or mass-murder against Iran, Syria, and Palestinians.
At any rate, just like Jews provided financial services for slavery in the American South -- most Jews fully supported the slave system and economy -- , they also served as merchants-of-death to further the conquest of American Indian lands. They supported white supremacist immigration-'genocide' of the Indians. Jewish merchants profited from blood money. Besides, Jews wanted the 'savage' Indians gone to make way for more of their own kind from the Old World. It's like Jews want Palestinians gone to make more room for Jews. And lets not forget Jewish-controlled Hollywood made all those 'white supremacist' and 'genocidal' Westerns about how glorious it was to wipe out Red Savages. In America or Israel(which was once Palestine), Jews act the same way: Sacrifice any number of goyim for Jewish aggrandizement.

But now, immigration is 'white supremacist' in another way in the 21st century. Look all around, and notice that Immigration Patterns are mostly about non-whites favoring white nations, esp. Anglo-made ones, as immigration destination. It is premised on the sense that white people are the best and do everything better. Since superior whites made the best nations, non-whites try to move to white nations for the good life. Why don't they stay in their own nations to make them nice as white nations? They feel they are hopeless for or incapable of such undertaking on their own. They must be with whites to have good stuff made and managed by whites. They look to whites as the Savior Race.
These non-whites admire, envy, and yearn for white made nations to such degree that countless numbers of them are resolves to permanently reject and leave behind their own peoples and cultures to go to white-made nations and become 'American', 'Canadian', or 'Australian', templates essentially of Anglo-founding-and-conception.
Imagine that. Tons of Chinese would rather come to the US, marry white people, learn English(and forget their own language), and live as minorities than be with their own kind in their mother nation. Same goes for Asian-Indians who, for all their talk of pride in their culture and history, despise their countrymen and prefer to emigrate and resettle in white-made nations. And browns in Latin America would rather come to America and live under the Anglo-made system of rule and economics than deal with their own problems. Browns prefer 'gringos' as elites over Latin whites who are considerably more corrupt. And Latin whites would rather come to America and live with 'gringos' than be stuck with browns whom they regard as incompetent and hopeless. The top immigration-destination nations among non-whites are all Anglo-made: US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Or the UK itself. Even as they resent Anglos and bitch about 'white supremacism', their actions speak louder than words: White people and white nations are superior to their own, and they want to be with Winner whites than with their own Loser kind.

And let's look at Jewish immigration past and present. Vile and nasty Jews love to nag and berate Anglos about 'white supremacism', but Jews always wanted to follow where Anglos go and be where the Anglos are. Jews were always most attracted to whites and to Anglos especially. If indeed Jews were truly appalled by white supremacism, Anglo-arrogance, and all that, why did they chase after Anglos? Why did they tirelessly pursue Anglos as the Goose that lays the Golden Egg? Why did Jewish bankers invest heavily Anglo imperialism and colonization?
Of course, the greatest Jewish success was made possible back of Anglos. If Anglos hadn't created American Civilization, Jewish power around the world would be much less. Anglos had talent, vision, and better governance to forge and form a great nation with a sound political, legal, and economic system, especially for their own kind. And Jews knew it and wanted access to Anglo goodies because, deep down inside, Jews knew that Anglos(and Germanic folks) were the most talented goyim in the world. Therefore, whenever Jews sought to emigrate, they always hoped to make it to Anglo-made nations. If Jews really love non-whites and hate Anglos(as they claim to in their endless diatribes), they should move out of white nations and relocate to Africa or Asia. But talk in cheap. If we judge Jews by walk than talk, they all favor white nations, esp Anglo-made ones. Latin American nations were made by Spanish and Latinos, but Jews don't much care for them either because of corruption, incompetence, and chaos(resulting from messy Diversity that breeds distrust, resentment, and hostility). We are told Diversity is so great, but then, why are the countless hordes fleeing diverse Latin America and India for white-majority nations, especially ones made by Anglos?
If not for Anglo achievement(on which Jews piggybacked), Jews would not be ruling the world. Anglos were the only people nice(and naive) enough to pass the reins of power to Jews who, as it should be clear by now, show no gratitude and only vicious animus. Jews are an envious people and hate the fact that Anglos than their own kind built the finest civilization. Also, as rulers over whites, they must spread 'white guilt' to paralyze whites into obeisance and submission to Jewish Supremacism. And even though Diversity will lead to tons of social problems in the US and EU, Jews push it just so they can play divide-and-rule among the Gentiles.

If we judge Jews and non-whites by what they DO as opposed to what they SAY, they are white-supremacists in the sense that they believe whites do everything the best. Their immigration patterns amply illustrate they prefer whites and white-nations over their own(and over other non-whites and their nations; we don't see too many Asians or Latin Americans scrambling to move to Africa or India, and if some non-whites move to Mexico, it's only as a way-station to the US; and notice how black African migrant-invaders pass through North Africa and even southern European nations to make it to Anglo-Germanic nations). After all, why else would non-whites reject their own nations and peoples in the hope of becoming 'American' or 'Canadian' if they didn't believe whites are superior and make & manage superior civilizations? Some will say it's entirely economic, but why have Anglos been far better at creating and managing nations where governance is cleaner and more efficient? The reasons are surely cultural and historical, genetics is also part of the equation. Just like genetic factors give Jews an edge in brains and give blacks an edge in brawn(and sports), white genetics were better suited for certain tasks, such as creating functional civilization with possibility for advancement in various fields. Of course, hurt pride among non-whites prevent them from being candid about why they immigrate to white-made nations. To assuage their own butt-hurt feelings, they claim a right to leech off whites since Western Imperialism stole everything from them. This is totally hilarious to anyone who knows about the state of Africa, Asia, Middle East, and etc. prior to Western domination over them. They were either savage, backward, or mired in stasis/stagnation. But because Jews like Yasha Levin control the Western Narrative, too many whites have bought into the Lie of 'white guilt' that says whites are uniquely to blame for all that is wrong in the world. Of course, some whites take a perverse kind of pride from 'white guilt'. By posturing as 'good whites' committed to redemption and compassion, they think they are angels for giving away their legacy to leeches.

Non-whites admire Anglo-nations as the best. They also regard whites as the most beautiful and want to have sex with them. Jewish men prefer white women, the 'shikses'. So many Jewish men have married white 'shikses'(Jewish term for filthy whore) because, in comparison, they find Jewish women to be ugly(and nasty in personality). So many black men prefer white women over black men. Asian women prefer white men over dorky Asian men.
Race-mixing or Interracism is also a kind of eugenics to make one's race look more white. Jews prefer 'Aryanized' Jews over Semitic-looking ones with hook-noses. In Israel, 'Aryan'-looking Jews are favored over Semitic or darker ones. Asians have plastic surgery and dye their hair blonde to look white. Asians want to mate with whites and create Eurasian kids whom they regard as more beautiful. Even in Latin American nations where whites are a minority, most celebs and stars are white or mostly white. Even Hugo Chavez, the champion of brown people, dumped his former wife and married a blonde. One might think Tiger Woods, being of mixed race, would seek out mixed-raced women. No, he only goes after Nordic Aryan types. Also, interracism is pushed by globalism as 'progressive' eugenics of creating a superior people. Jew-run media tell us that mixed-race people are more intelligent, more beautiful, and better in everything. (That must be why race-mixed Peru is the peak of world civilization. It must also be why Mexico is filled with the superior race of Mestizos. But if those race-mixed Mestizos are so superior, why do they want to run from others like them and start a new life in gringo-made US?)

The fact is most non-white immigrants or wanna-be immigrants are 'white supreamcist' in their preferences and aspirations. When so many of them desperately seek to leave their own people, culture, and land to come to Anglo-made nations, they are voting and saying with their feet, "Anglos are better, they do things better, and we would rather live in Anglo-made nations than in our own that suck so bad."

It's likely that the reason why Jews like Yasha Levine try to shame and browbeat white pride & white consciousness is to force whites into submissive mode at the altar of Jewish supremacism, the power that now rules America. Jews want to permanently seal their domination over goyim. All these Wars for Israel, endless giveaway to Israel, condemnation of noticing Jewish perfidy as 'antisemitic', unrelenting Hate News against Russia, Syria, Palestinians, Christians, and Iran(simply because Jews hate them), and etc. Jews know that Jewish Supremacist Power can be sustained only atop the White Horse. Therefore, the white horse must be reined and saddled. It must fear the Jewish whip and spur. Even as Jews beat on whites, whites must pledge total allegiance to Jews. Jews are the massuh who cannot tolerate uppity-ness among whites. If whites refuse to kowtow before Jews and instead speak truth to Jewish Power, Jewish supremacist massuhs demean those uppity whites as 'white supremacist', 'anti-Semites', and 'nazis'. If Jewish Power cannot be criticized on account that Jews are a perfect people, then it's sign of Jewish Supremacist Ideology. After all, humans are not gods, but if we must worship Jews as the god-like race, it means Jews think of themselves as beyond criticism or reproach... like they are indeed God himself. The chutzpah of these nasty people is unbelievable. In Jewish Supremacist mode, they rabidly & virulently defame and dehumanize whites(along with Russians, Iranians, and Arabs), but if whites dare to talk back and point to Jewish corruption and rottenness(or if whites merely mutter "It's Okay to be White" in meek David Copperfield mode), Jews blow their top and fume about how the Nazis are back in town again. What foulness!

In truth and by all evidence, Jews and non-whites do feel that white people are the most attractive and that white nations are most promising(because they were created by and are managed by white people). Now, if white people were conscious of their worth & value, they would naturally try to keep their achievements for themselves and keep out leeches and parasites. And then, Jews and non-whites can't get their hands on all the white goodies. By making non-whites join in the plunder of White Wealth, Jews seek to create the impression that they aren't the only usurpers and takers, but in fact, the people who have gained by far the most from the parasitism have been the Jews. Jews get the white bread and butter, others get the crumbs and margarine.

Jews and non-whites want access to white nations because, deep in their hearts, they know whites have done everything better(and will continue to do so until White Wealth has been bled out of existence). Therefore, in order to lower white defenses against Jewish & non-whites invasion and parasitism, Jews and non-whites cynically and/or fanatically push this notion that 'whiteness' is evil while 'diversity' is great. But if diversity is so great, why are people fleeing diverse North Africa for Europe? Or fleeing ultra-diverse India and Latin America for whiter nations? Hmm. Why did Jewish immigrants favor whiter US over brown Latin America for immigration destination? Facts speak for themselves: Jewish immigrants were white-supremacist or white-preferist in their migratory preferences.

If Jews really hate Anglos, they should just leave Anglo-made nations. Sooner the better. If Jews really love non-whites and people of color oh-so-very-much, they should pack up things and move to India, Africa, or nations like Bolivia. But we know they won't. Jews have always chosen white-nations, esp Anglo ones, as their main destinations. And when Anglo-Americans were wiping out Indians, Jews didn't protest such exercise of white supremacism. If anything, Jews fully took part in it. Jews were like jackals trailing lions to feed on the kill. Jews trailed whites to feed on white bounty.

Jews need to look in the mirror. Jewish identity has long been about supremacy. The notion of the Chosen People. And higher Jewish IQ owes to selective breeding of merchants and scholars. And Jews didn't care one iota about Chinese who died of opium addiction. Jews profited from the Opium Trade, just like Jewish Globalists raped and plundered Russia in the 1990s, creating socio-economic conditions that led to the deaths of millions.

Jews need to get off the high horse. They need to stop projecting THEIR own hatred and supremacism onto others. Or if they fed on white supremacism, they must share in the blame. Jewish merchants who sold guns to white cowboys are just as guilty.

Commentary on "Elite White Privilege"(by Audacious Epigone) & the Jewish Strategy of Power by Elite Control and Demographic Manipulation

https://www.unz.com/anepigone/elite-white-privilege/

http://www.mideastweb.org/mandate.htm

The Mandate for Palestine was a dress rehearsal for something much bigger.

Mandate for the West(and then the Rest).

Mandate for Palestine led to eventual Jewish demographic takeover of Palestine to be reconstituted as Israel, the Jewish state, the only part of the world deserving of national identity and right of territory. Jews are mono-nationalist. Only their nationalism is true nationalism. All other nationalisms are false and must be dissolved. Jews denounce on poly-nationalism like Jewish monotheism reviled all pagan idols as false gods.

Mandate for the West is to eventually replace native-whites(in Europe) and founder-whites(in North America & Australia) with masses of non-whites. How does this benefit Jews? Diversity will make cohesive nationalism impossible in white nations. Diversity will create cracks and fissures, and Jewish elites get to pit various sides against one another while taking the lion share of the prize.
Imagine a nation as a Spartan military unit. United and strong, standing together with shields and spears. Very difficult for outsider-enemy to penetrate the phalanx. But imagine a rag-tag bunch of troops of diversity. They would never stand and fight together. As they push each other, cracks form among them, allowing for easy penetration by the enemy.

Mandate for the West thus favors Jewish power in the long run.

Finally, there is Mandate for the Rest. As non-whites flock to the West(the Metropole), they take on PC ideology and globo-homo POZ and export them back to their home countries. In time, even the nations of their origin turn globo-homo and worship diversity. They too allow massive immigration-invasion, and diversity leads to divisions and cracks, and Jewish power can penetrate, exploit the differences, and take over. After Europe, it will be smaller East Asian nations that will fall, esp Japan, S Korea, and Taiwan as yellow dogs are most imitative of the West as model.

Jews think big. With prophetic minds, they look ahead to their grand chess plan for the world.

Audacious Epigone: If the new populations view them as especially egregious examples of the old population and the old population views them as traitorous backstabbers, I’m not sure that works out particularly well for them in the end.

It works out because 'new populations' are diverse. Even if they come to envy and resent Jews, they will be at loggerheads with one another. Browns, yellows, and blacks don't see eye to eye. Neither do Chinese and Hindus. And even among browns, there are so many gradations of identity and color(flimsily held together only by shared resentment of higher-achieving 'gringo' or 'yanqui'). Puerto Ricans don't have much in common with Indios from Guatemala. So, they will be more divided among their own kind than against Jews. Also, as Jews are on top and will remain there due to higher IQ, non-Jews know they must suck up to Jews to gain access into the uber-sphere. Besides, Jews can exploit the 'new people vs old people' dichotomy indefinitely as immigration-invasion is to be endless. So, even as new people settle and evolve into old people, there will be ever more new peoples.

As for old people, Jews only need the collaboration of the elites. Masses don't count for beans UNLESS there is a massive populist revolt with pitchforks(which is rare in history like asteroids hitting the earth). The fact is white elites are willing to sell their souls to Jews for financial gains and on insta-moral grounds. If you're a white cuck and serve Jewish Power, there are lots of prizes. Paul Ryan will make a killing as a lobbyist. Also, as Jews are the Eternally Holy People of Shoah, white cuck elites feel 'cleansed' and 'baptized' by rubbing shoulders with Jews, especially as the Jewish-controlled media and academia made whites out to be uniquely tainted by history. As the result, whites need atonement and salvation, and one quick way to get it is by sucking up to holy People of Shoah. "Look, I got some Jew Magic on me!" Since white elites suck up to Jews more than the white masses do, it creates the impression of 'good whites' at the top and 'bad deplorable whites' on the bottom. This has the effect of making 'good white elites' serve Jews than represent 'bad white people', who Jews say must be replaced. It divides whites along class lines.

Mass-Immigration-Invasion of non-whites is the final nail in the Jewish Strategy for Total Power.
Jews had the unique potential of rapidly gaining the dominant position in the US. Now, how could they when they were only 2% of the population? I mean there was no chance that the Jewish 2% of US could elect a Jewish president. The Irish had the numbers to take over many big cities. Jews didn't. Even in NY, they are like 20% of the population. Jews gained power not by elections but by taking over elite institutions. Only they could have done this due to combination of high IQ, chutzpah, and big think. Also, they could pass as whites, which made it more acceptable to the white majority(than if Asians tried it, but then Asians lack chutzpah and are less intelligent than Jews). So, Jews used the bypass method of power. Just gain control of elites, and you gain control of society. Selection than election. With Jewish control of media, law firm, finance, entertainment, vice industries, real estate, and etc, they could buy off any politician of either political party. Also, with control of media, they could smear and destroy anyone. And, Jews spread the notion of 'antisemitism' that says anyone who notices nefarious Jewish influence is a 'nazi' while anyone who serves Jews 24/7 is the most wonderful goy. Since the Shoah Narrative made Jews out to be holy and since flattering Jews could be rewarded with blessings of approval from the holiest people, it became De Rigueur for whites to roll over before Jews for pats on the head. So, everyone in power became cucks to Jews.

But Jews still felt nervous because having elite power alone doesn't secure permanence. This was evident in the history of the British Empire. The Brits gained control of non-white territories by bullying and buying off the local elites. So, if the Brits could control their puppet leaders in Asia, Africa, and Middle East, they had control of all the territories and all the populace as most people are sheeple. BUT, there was the chance that a real national leader might arise and challenge the cuck-collaborators and the Empire. Such a leader may rouse up the masses... like what happened in Cuba. The US had TOTAL control of most of the political and economic big-shots in Cuba. By scheming with the cream at the top, US could effectively milk all of Cuba. But Fidel Castro and others came along and they led the national masses to victory against the Cuba elites... and this spelled doom for American influence as well because US had put all its eggs in the elite-basket. Once the Cuban elites fell, US influence was gone as well.

This is why Jews aren't content with elite power alone. If white masses reject the current white elites, they also reject Jewish power that is mainly attached to white elites than to white masses. At least in the past when US was ruled by white Christians, there was a connection between white Christian rulers and white Christian masses. But will white Christians, for the long haul, accept Jewish rulers? For the time being, it seems whites are pro-Jewish and support Israel, but could this last indefinitely, esp when there's mounting evidence of vile and nasty Jewish behavior in so many sectors, not least against whites who, besides, are often berated by (((fellow whites)))? What if white masses lose confidence in their own leaders as a bunch of 'cuck-collaborators' and long for an American Castro or Putin? This is why Jews hated Donald Trump with such virulence(even though he turned out to be just another cucky-wuck). Trump ran on America First that implicitly said a white guy like him should reconnect with and protect the traditional (white) American nation. Jews called Trump 'literally Hitler', and even though that is hysterical, there is a kernel of truth to the notion that Trump is figuratively Hitler. After all, there was the nationalist element in Hitlerism that called for unity of German elites and German masses(a good idea before the pathological nut decided to shift into imperialist mode). Hitler was a bad example of it, but there is nothing more effective against imperialism than national unity between leaders and masses. US went from empire to colony of empire. During the Cold War, it was USSR empire vs US empire. After the Cold War, US became a colony of an even bigger empire: Empire of Judea with networks all across US, Canada, Latin America, EU, Russia, Israel, and etc. So, EOJ(Empire of Judea) wants the white elites to serve the empire -- like British expected Hong Kong elites to serve the British Empire than represent Chinese nationalism -- than reconnect with their own kind.

The way Jews see it, AS LONG AS there is a white majority in the US, there is a 'chance', even if a slim one, that white elites and white masses may unite against the Jews. Or, a new white elite will arise(like Castro and others did in Cuba) to reject the cuck-elites. (Alt Right had this chance, but idiot Richard Spencer allied with neo-Nazi morons and yammered endlessly about a need for Faustian white neo-imperialist supremacism.) Jews believe that securing elite power isn't enough. If white elites stop collaborating with Jews or if they are rejected by white masses who demand a new white elite that is actually responsive to white needs, Jewish elite power will fail like American power in Cuba. As the existing cuck-elite falls, so will its master and sponsor.

So, Jews feel that they must secure demographic power as well. But how can they when there's no way Jews can be the majority of any nation except Israel? This is where Diversity enters the picture. Jews know from the Austro-Hungarian Empire that Diversity can be useful to Jews. Recall that most groups in that empire distrusted and even hated Jews.... but they also hated one another and were thus unable to unite against Jewish power and influence. Diversity means Jews can pit whites vs blacks, whites vs yellows, whites vs Hindus, whites vs Muslims, whites vs browns, blacks vs browns, blacks vs yellows, blacks vs hindus, blacks vs Muslims, browns vs yellows, browns vs Hindus, browns vs Muslims, etc. Sure, there is some POC talk about unity of non-whites against whites/Jews, but it's mostly empty noise because non-whites don't see eye-to-eye on many subjects... such as Affirmative Action.

Imagine the NY Giants playing a team made up of players of various teams. All the Giants are playing for their side against their opposing team. In contrast, the diverse players of the other team, while playing against the Giants, are also playing against one another, which makes it impossible for them to form a cohesive team. Giants have a huge advantage.

Jews are masters at splitting the goyim between elites and masses. Jews did this with whites and can do it to ANY goy group. White elites like Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, Hillary Clinton, and Beta O'Dork do NOTHING for whites. Their main priority is being part of the Privilege Club, and so, they suck up to Jews.
The same can be done with ANY group. Notice how Hindu- and Chinese-American elites in the US are total suck-ass dogs of Jewish Power. Once they've been let into the Power Club, their main priority is to BELONG(be an insider), and that means sucking up to Jews while snubbing their own people. Look at Fareed Zakaria. This non-white brownie has been let into the Power Club, and he beats the drums for Wars for Israel. The one time he praised Trump was when missiles were fired into Syria.

Commentary on "Holy Minority Day: Holocaustianity, Hysteria and the Hotel of Hate"(by TOBIAS LANGDON)

https://www.unz.com/article/holy-minority-day-holocaustianity-hysteria-and-the-hotel-of-hate/

There is a political paradox.

Even as Jews increasingly vilify white conservatives(scapegoats for all problems) as the unifying theme for Jews and People of Color, they also increasingly draw on white conservatives to support Jews and Israel, because, after all, Grievance Politics among the POC often turns against Jewish privilege and Zionist tyranny. Jews depend more and more on the water from the well they are poisoning. With decreasing support for Israel and growing criticism of white-Jewish privilege among the expanding non-white and radical-white base among Democrats, Jews have to depend more and more on white conservatives for unconditional support for Jews and Israel. The vile Anti-BDS law passed with near-total support from Republicans while only 40% support from Democrats. Jews will increasingly have to rely on the very people they denigrate most in media, academia, law, state, entertainment, advertising, and corporacracy. But can Jews be assured of continued support among white conservatives when the latter is beginning to awaken to the fact that it's the Jews who are leading the anti-white derangement syndrome among the POC? But then, Jews must shame and blame whites in order to make them serve Jews. After all, the default position of any people is to feel good about their own kind and serve their own interests. Naturally, white Christians and conservatives should serve white/Christian/conservative interests. To make them do otherwise, they must be made to feel that the Other is somehow superior, morally or spiritually, to themselves. And Jews have done this by implanting 'white guilt' into the souls of whites, both liberals and conservatives. Thus, whites feel morally tainted by history and seek redemption by serving the Holy Other. As far as white conservatives are concerned, serving Jews(and maybe blacks and homos) should be good enough, and so, they go out on a limb to appear as 'good for Jews'. But for Jews, this isn't enough because there is still the possibility that whites may change their minds one day... and then what? So, the ONLY way to ensure permanent Jewish domination is via Diversity. That way, with whites relegated to minority status in the US, they won't be able to use electoral-demographic majority power to topple Jewish supremacy. Jews want more Diversity because, deep down inside, they know Intersectionality is really about Gridlock among Goyim. Even within the Proglob camp, so-called intersectionality has led to Demolition Derby or Roller Derby among blacks, homos, women, white working class, browns, yellows, and etc. It's turning into Road Rage politics... like the movie CRASH that won Best Pic.

Anyway, it seems more and more whites are waking up to the fact of Jewish hostility towards them. An obvious case has been Ann Coulter who, in 2016, mocked GOP candidates for droning on and on about the 'fuc*king Jews'. For such awakened whites, we need to end mass immigration as soon as possible because loss of white majority will mean end of GOP, and then whites are lost for good.
But whites should take cues from the Jews on the Art of Power. If a people need majority power to rule, how does one account for the fact that Jews, who are only 2% of the nation, totally rules the US?
So, how can whites threaten Jewish power even if they lose majority status in the US? They can make Jews have a taste of their own medicine. Jewish 'progressive' line has been 'diversity and equality are good, while privilege is bad'. Okay, then whites should take the Jews at their word and side with the POC against the most privileged people in the US, the Jews. Jeremy Corbyn is doing this in the UK with hilarious reactions from the Jewish community. Jews in UK have been dumping on white Britons as 'racists' and demanding that whites welcome and embrace non-whites. Well, that is exactly what Corbyn's Labour did, and guess how the Jews are reacting? They are flipping out because most non-whites don't give a rat's ass about super-rich Jewish bankers, Israel, Zionist imperialism, and Holocaust-Cult-Forever. This is why the US would do best to get rid of the GOP, have all whites join the Democrats, and then have whites side with POC against the Deep State dominated by Jews, homos, and cucks. Then, the current elites can be brought down, and then, the ensuing chaos will bring back the Restart of History from the terrible 'End of History' of Fukuyama's naive idealization.

I suppose Jews still got the homo card. Homo Power is mostly white-male, and it is reliably on the side of Jews because vain homos love power and privilege. It's no wonder that 10% of DC is now homo. Homos go there to seek power, and Jews have elevated them(along with cuck-dog Mormons) to serve as the missionary arm of globo-homo hegemony. Thus, homos, along with Mormons, have played a big role in Wars for Israel and new 'cold war' with Russia. Homos + Mormons = Homormons. Homos not only love to serve the Power(that is mostly Jewish) but appreciate the fact that Jews have decided to make Homomania the substitute for Christianity, indeed the Cult of the New World Order. As for Mormons, most of them are just status-strivers and moral-materialists, i.e. their moralism is all about making money, and money is the highest good. Also, ashamed of their history as an odd cult and ever so eager to appear respectable to the current globo-homo ruling elites, Mormons will go out of their way to cuck hard. Salt Lake City Mormons are the favorite dogs of Goldman Sachs and dutifully voted for Obama and Hillary. Mormons are the Sheep State within the Deep State.

Commentary on "Jewish Involvement in Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations — Part One"(by Andrew Joyce)

Jewish Involvement in Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations — Part One

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/12/28/jewish-involvement-in-contemporary-refugee-and-migrant-organizations-part-one/

Look all around the media and academia, and the the elites believe spreading falsehoods is okay(and even necessary) because, according to PC wartime logic, lies in the service of the Holy Crusade are more justified than truths in the service of Evil Tyranny. The value of the Noble Lie.

It's the mindset during wartime. Wars are so extreme that truth is secondary to winning. Both Right and Left agree on this in times of war. US and USSR told tons of lies in World War II, but because the overall understanding was that Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were so utterly Evil, all means and methods(even deceitful propaganda) were justified in taking them down. (And of course, Germany and Japan did the same, often sacrificing truth for their own formulation of the Noble Lie.)

Now, if there had been no war, truth might have been favored over 'us and them'(or 'good vs evil') mentality. But the war was on, and the enemy was seen not merely as a rival or competitor but Evil Incarnate. This was why so many on the Right were willing to tell lies about the Soviet Union and communism. Even if they peddled in lies and half-truths, such were apparently justified because the Soviet Union was the Evil Empire. Its defeat was so necessary that even lies that served against communism were preferable to truth that suggested the USSR wasn't all bad(thereby weakening the righteousness of anti-communist moral furor; besides, moralism or moral-high is addictive like drugs; people love to 'vape' on that stuff).

The central fact of PC is that it is on war-footing as Jonathan Haidt pointed out.



It's like Sonny Corleone laments that Tom is not a wartime consiglieri. Tom is 'business'-minded and believes that negotiation is still possible with the other side. He feels that what the Tataglias and Sollozzo pulled wasn't evil. Nasty yes and very ugly. But it was 'business' and all sides have done similar things. In contrast, Sonny(and later Michael in a more calculated way) believes it's a matter of us or them. Only war, not peace, can settle the differences. One side must win, the other side must lose. When Michael takes power, he removes Tom from the role of consiglieri. Michael will only pretend to negotiate but really gear up for war and go for blitzkrieg take-out of the heads of the Five Families.



While NPCs or SJWs make the most noise, they are mere 'buttons' and 'buffers' of the ultimate power of the GLOB(that is dominated by Jewish Power). Jewish globalists see the world in terms 'We rule and they obey'. Goy autonomy is like a slave rebellion to Jewish Globalists who've achieved the summit of power. No other option is tolerable.
Of course, if Jewish globalists laid out the the terms of PC in such brazenly tribal and supremacist manner, no one would follow them. If anything, NPCs or SJWs will turn against Jewish Power as being nazi-like. So, Jews have masked what is essentially an us-versus-them tribal agenda with a good-versus-evil universal calling. Thus, most people are blind to the struggle between Jewish Hegemony and Goy Autonomy AND instead see the world in terms of Diversity & Inclusion versus 'Racism' & Nazism(which today means even Hungarians and Poles who want to be left alone) It used to be that Nazism represented the invasive force while anti-Nazis represented defensive resistance. Today, however, Europeans who resist the globalist bankers and third world hordes are the 'nazis', whereas the invasive forces -- Zionist-controlled US military or African mobs -- are the crusading angels against 'hate'. But then, we live in a world where a man pretending to be a woman is said to be 'properly gendering' himself whereas someone who sees him as still a man is 'misgendering' him.

War warps the mind. As the saying goes, "First casualty of war is truth." In some ways, the motto is a complaint, but it's also an admittance of the usefulness of 'necessary evil' in extreme times. After all, there are moments when lies are justified. If some thug is out to rob you and hurt your loved ones, does it make sense to offer up any truth that will advantage him? No, you'd be justified in telling any lie to survive, keep your wealth, and protect your family. In crime movies like DOG DAY AFTERNOON and HIGH AND LOW, lawmen use deception against the crooks who are seen as undeserving of fair play; they are criminals who violated the social contract after all.

The problem is such a mentality can outlast the 'war' context and come to poison politics by continuing to warp reality by appeals to wartime footing. (Since the context no longer exists, its facsimile is projected onto the world via the media and think-tanks that inform the political culture.) Sharper or more experienced minds saw how this played out in the aftermath of the Cold War. Finally, the world could breathe a sigh of relief and hope for better relations all around. But the Neocons, Anti-Communist nostalgists, and Warmongers had to cook up new cold wars(that even led to hot wars) by projecting Cold War mentality onto a host of other conflicts(actually of limited regional relevance). But then, this mentality could be sourced back to the aftermath of WWII, what with Jews and Interventionists invoking 'new nazis' and 'new hitlers' to justify their power move. (For a time, many Jews felt Joe McCarthy and the American Right were the 'new nazis', whereas hardline anti-communists argued that the Soviet Union was just as dangerous as Nazi Germany.) Iran has become the perennial 'New Nazi nation', and there is now a 'new cold war' with Russia because its opposition to 'gay marriage' is apparently neo-Stalinist.

In GOODFELLAS, Paulie tells Henry that he looked the other way on the drug-dealing because Henry was in a tight situation and had to do whatever was necessary to survive while in prison. But now that Henry is a free man on the outside, he mustn't get involved with narcotics because the risks are too high. So, what was justifiable in one situation isn't in another. In the end, it's the drug trade that brings down not only Henry but all those fingered by him. Paulie was right.



The truth that must be recognized is that the predominant Jewish Power sees the world in terms of Us versus Them, or we Jewish Superiors who deserve to rule versus You Goyim Inferiors who exist to serve us. Because Jews are so vastly outnumbered by goyim, they feel they mustn't ever let up on their War on Goyim. But then, since Jews cannot win an openly Jews vs Goyim War, they use PC to re-frame it into Diversity(and Social Justice) versus Nazis(and White Supremacism), though in the Middle East and North Africa, the Narrative is re-framed into Forces-of-Liberal-Democratic-values(that includes white American soldiers in battle gear to mow down tons of Muslims and Arabs) against tyrants and oppressors(such as Assad and rulers of Iran). Use whites against non-whites in the Middle East in the name of spreading 'Western values' & 'liberty' AND use non-whites against whites in the West in the name of 'diversity' and 'inclusion'. Both agendas serve Jewish Hegemony, but whites are fooled into believing they are spreading 'democracy', and non-whites are fooled into thinking they are upholding the magic of 'diversity' by fighting 'racism'(even though their immigration patterns of favoring white nations over their own would indicate that they believe whites are better than their own peoples and cultures; shouldn't that count as 'racist'?)

Anyway, because Jewish Power is in constant war-footing, they use their control of finance, media, academia, and government to push wartime mindset in journalism and think-tanks. Jews in media and academia know what the real game is(though some idealistic Jews like Philip Weiss and Max Blumenthal rebel against this), and goyim in journalism schools are trained to be attack-dogs than tracking-dogs. So much of journalism is about mindless frenzy of hunting the enemy and tearing it from limb from limb than about tracking down the truth. Fact-hunting in today's journalism isn't about tracking down the truth as the highest good but about mauling any 'inconvenient fact' into shreds to send a message that certain views simply cannot be allowed to inhabit the media-sphere and academisphere. In recent years, certain exiled or banned facts made their way back through internet platforms, but the Jewish ethno-monopoly is now working to hunt them down to extinction as well:



Because Jewish Power sees everything in terms of Us(who deserve to win and rule) versus Them(who only exist to serve us) AND because NPCs or SJWs(usually goyim who've come under Jewish influence in media and academia) see everything in terms of war between Resistance and the Nazis, they favor the lie over the truth IF the lie favors their agenda. They will favor facts and truth when such are apolitical, neutral, or advantages their side, BUT when given the choice between the lie that favors the agenda and the fact that validates the Enemy, they will choose the lie every time because their mentality is totally in war-footing mode. To Jewish Power, Trump(even in his lame cucked-out state) represents the awakening of white consciousness for autonomy from Jewish hegemony; and to NPCs or SJWs(brainwashed by Jewish-controlled media and academia), Trump represents 'racist' and 'white supremacist'. The mentality of your average goy NPC in media or academia came to light in, of all places, a vape shop. Look at this virtue-vaper who won't sell products to a Trump-supporter.



But the American Right shares something in common with NPC or SJW-types. Because there's been so much emphasis on God and guns in US conservatism -- and mindless flag-waving for the military -- , too many American Conservatives have been as easy to dupe and manipulate as the NPC-types. If NPC's can be made to see 'nazis', 'racists', and 'white supremacists' everywhere, the guns-and-God American Conservatives could be counted onto support any new hate-fest or even war against whatever is deemed the New Evil Empire. Looking back, too many on the American Right were duped into over-zealous anti-communism and support of insane wars and sanctions-policies since the end of the Cold War that only served Zionist-globalist and military-industrial interests. It's good to see that Tucker Carlson and even Ann Coulter have come to see the stupidity of such mindset. (As for certain elements of the 'far right', their wartime mentality against Jews is so strong that they can't see anything admirable about Jews and can't see evil in something obviously insane like Nazi Imperialism. Warped by War Path.)

Ideally, people should favor the facts over falsehoods(and truth over lies), and I think all people, regardless of political ideology, agree to this. But, most people, again regardless of ideology, believe that there are extreme situations or conditions when winning matters more than anything because losing means the failure to survive or the triumph of evil.

Survival is less a moral issue than a life-force issue. All organisms want to live, 'good' or 'bad'. Even in movies about criminals and outlaws as 'heroes', we find ourselves rooting for those trying to survive and make it out alive(as in escape-from-prison movies). There is an instinctive animal-part of us that makes us identify with anyone or anything that wants to live for another day. Even Jews watching DAS BOOT(German film about a submarine crew in WWII) can understand the all-too-human-animal desperation of men struggling to survive.

When it comes to the elemental matter of survival, truth-or-false is secondary to live-or-die. It's like Winston Smith is willing to betray even the woman he loves to be spared from the ravenous rats in George Orwell's 1984. There is a part of Jewishness that forever feels like cornered rats trying to survive, ranging from desperate Jews hiding from Nazis during WWII to globalist overlords trying to maintain their tribal-imperial domination over all goyim. In the past, Jews tried to survive as Jews; today, Jews try to 'survive' as Jewish Supremacists as they've become addicted to Total Power.

The OTHER reason that makes people favor Falsehood over Facts has to do with Sacro-Mentality. We see this in both religion and PC(which is a form of quasi-religious secular cult that views esp. Jews, Negros, and Homos as the Holy Three). When something is held to be sacred, its infinite worth cannot be contested with facts and/or reason.
It's like faith is beyond facts. You can lay out all the logical argument and hard evidence against the existence of God or miracles, but those with Faith will continue to believe even against all factual evidence. To true-believers, God or Jesus(or Muhammad) is so sacred and holy, so above everything, that they cannot be bothered with 'petty' facts or details that go against Faith. Facts wilt in the face of Faith. PC is a neo-faith with Jews, Negroes, and homos as sacred cows. So, facts don't matter to the idolaters of PC. It's like no amount of scientific facts can persuade religious people to lose or compromise their Faith. This is even true of relatively higher IQ people. Nick Fuentes is a smart educated guy but, like Patrick Buchanan(another smart person)who has always rejected evolution(as an affront to Christian theology), is willing to play dumb about scientific facts -- such as Earth revolving around the Sun than vice versa -- to prop up some archaic Christian Orthodoxy about the cosmos. As for PC pod-people, too many have undergone 'communion' with Diversity to harbor any skepticism about it. 'Diversity is our strength' or DIOS is one of their core catechisms. So, even when increasing Diversity is destroying the fabric of their societies, they stick with the Faith than face up to Facts.
In summary, animal instinct for survival(of basic self or dominant position) and spiritual inspiration for sanctity both militate against facts that come together into the truth. Jewish mania for survival(as hegemonic supremacists) and NPC/SJW fanaticism for self-righteous sanctimony are the core animating factors at the nuclei of PC.

Response to "Hungarian Foreign Minister DEMOLISHES triggered BBC reporter calling for open borders in Europe"

Actually, this is what the Hungarian Foreign Minister should have said:

Diversity works only within the EUROPEAN Union. In order for the EU to be European, it must be by Europeans and for Europeans. As it currently functions, the EU might as well be called the World Union, or especially the Afro-Islamo-European-Union. It says something about current EU that it is so hostile toward fellow whites in Russia and Hungary and Poland while being so celebratory and welcoming of Africans, Arabs, and Asians. So, basically, the current EU wages war on White Europe and tries to unite Europe with non-Europe. Furthermore, it wages war on the meaning of what it means to be European. According to EU, a 'European' is anyone who just comes to Europe and signs a piece of paper. So, history, culture, and blood no longer matter. A European with 10,000s of years of racial evolution in Europe and 1,000s of years of cultural history in Europe is NO MORE EUROPEAN than a newly arrived African or Arab who just learned the language and signed a citizenship paper. Basically, it means that the roots of a European has NO meaning. It doesn't matter if your roots in Europe racially go back eons and culturally go back millennia. You are NO MORE EUROPEAN than some Arab or African who just came for free gibs and to assimilate to globo-homo Hollywood-Rap culture.
Calling Africans, Arabs, and Asians the 'New Europeans' is a sleight-of-hand trick. It's like replacing orange juice with lime juice and labeling it as 'new orange juice'. Suppose I take over your house and call myself the 'new you'. That way, YOU didn't lose your house to me because I'm the 'new you'. So, the house still belongs to you because I am 'you', or the 'new you'. Isn't that ridiculous? It's all semantic BS.

Hungary joined the EUROPEAN Union to cooperate more fully with fellow Europeans. It didn't join to become one with Afro-Islamo-European Union. Also, Hungarians know what a real European is. He is a person with deep racial, historical, and cultural roots in Europe. But EU has changed rules so that ANYONE can become an Insta-European by signing a piece of paper. The rich stream of European blood has been replaced with the stamp of globo-homo ink. A true European has no more claim or birthright to Europe than billions of non-Europeans around the world. (This is the logic of colonialism and imperialism. Just like European imperialists tried to suppress the birthrights of the peoples they conquered, the globalist project of EU seeks to suppress any notion of ancestral claim and birthright among Europeans in their mother-continent.) EU will say dumb things like 'Europe was always a world of immigrants', but virtually all those peoples were fellow whites, fellow Europeans. Surely, a bunch of blacks going from one African nation to another is less jarring than a bunch of non-Africans settling in Africa. The same is true of Europe. A bunch of Poles going to Germany or UK is less jarring and disruptive than millions of black Africans and Arab Muslims taking over entire areas of Europe. Also, the history of Europe was about resistance against foreign invaders. Mongols invaded Russia and even reached Poland. They were eventually pushed out. Moors invaded Sicily and Spain. They were pushed back to North Africa eventually. Turks invaded Greece and parts of Balkans; they tried to invade more. Europeans rolled back the Turkish tide. Europe wasn't about inviting invasions by non-Europeans but about repelling them.

Anyway, it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who've decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East(and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they're puppets of Jewish Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Jewish Domination).

Also, there is no greater human right than for a nation to survive as a people and culture. Demographic Imperialism that replaces the people and culture is a form of geo-ethnocide. It's obvious from the creation of Israel that massive movements of peoples can lead to a destruction of a people and culture. Massive Jewish demographic imperialism led to the eradication of Palestine. Palestinians live like animals in a zoo in Gaza. They live under Apartheid conditions in the West Bank.
After WWII, the anti-imperialist struggles of Third World peoples were all nationalist. Hindus in India told the British to go home because India is for Indians. Africans told Europeans to pack up and leave because black Africa belongs to black Africans. Anti-imperialism founded on the principle of universal nationalism was the most fundamental form of human rights. Before we can have individual rights and liberties, we must be free as a people from foreign or imperialist domination. For example, Palestinian individuals in Israel have many individual rights and liberties, but they are NOT free as a people. Their nation, Palestine, has been taken over by Jews, and all Palestinians, no matter how rich or free as individuals, don't have a nation because their land now belongs to Zionist overlords. If it happened to Palestinians, it can happen to anyone. Consider how Kosovo had once been the sacred homeland of Serbians. But over time, Albanian Muslims moved in and settled in Kosovo under Ottoman rule, and the Serbs lost their ancient homeland forever. But I suppose EU can advise Serbians to just see Albanian Muslims as 'New Serbians'. Of course, Albanians don't see themselves that way.

Also, Diversity has many meanings. The World is Diverse, after all. So, Diversity as a condition of the world isn't a problem. The world will always be diverse, made up of various races, ethnic groups, nations, cultures, religions, regions, and etc. But Diversity as PC formula is about forcing Demographic Imperialism on each nation(except Israel). Every nation must be made into a mini-world. But why? Hungary is Hungary, and it should be Hungarian. If you want to see China or Africa, visit China or Africa. Why bring China, Africa, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and etc. into your own nation, especially if it's small? If rising Diversity is such a huge headache for massive nations like the US and Brazil with so much space, imagine its impact on smaller nations like Hungary and Poland? At the very least, white Americans can flee from Diversity. In small European nations, you are stuck with it right outside your door.

The kind of Diversity pushed by EU is really a form of imperialism. Diversity as a condition of the world is just a reality. But Diversity as a formula is about coercing all nations(except Israel) to surrender to massive demographic imperialism and replacement. It's usually about higher-IQ prosperous nations with low-birthrates being demographically taken over by low-IQ peoples from poor nations with high birthrates. The result will be loss of entire civilizations. Just do the math. Over time, the current Diversity policy of EU will turn all of Europe into something like Morocco. Is Morocco a happy place? If diverse North Africa is so great, why do people there want to move to white Europe?

Also, EU's pontificating about Human Rights is so much BS. If EU really cares about non-whites, why doesn't it ever stand up to Jewish-run US neo-imperialist policy that destroyed so much of the Middle East and North Africa? For the most part, the EU didn't do anything about George W. Bush's illegal war on Iraq. EU was silent about Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright's sanctions that killed 100,000s of Iraqi women and children. The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank. EU has gone along with US sanctions against Iran that hurt so many people. EU supported Obama-and-Hillary's destruction of Libya even though Gaddafi made peace with the West. EU worked with the US to aid terrorists and Jihadis to tear Syria apart. 400,000 people died. EU never stood up to Jewish-run US empire that destroys millions of lives in the Muslim World.
Indeed, the so-called 'refugee' crisis is the result of Jewish-run US neo-imperialism in Middle East and North Africa. But the EU, that is gutless in standing up to Zionist-American power, huffs and puffs about Hungary and Poland whose only desire is to protect their nations. It is the Jewish-run US that is pushing the Invade-Invite Policy. It says the US should freely invade and destroy nations around the world(especially to serve Israel's interests), and as millions and millions of people will be displaced by such invasions, the white world must 'invite' those people as a 'humanitarian' gesture. So, Jews use Western Power to destroy all nations hated by Israel, and then, Jews morally pressure white nations to accept the 'refugees'. Of course, Israel takes none and won't even give back Golan Heights that was stolen from Syria. What a bunch of a**holes.

Finally, Diversity-as-Formula is a form of imperialism. Nazi Empire was about diversity. It was about many peoples being forced to live under the Nazi umbrella. Soviet Empire was diverse. It was about many peoples being forced to live under Soviet Hegemony. The EU is now about forcing demographic imperialism on every European nation to make them more diverse. Just like Nazi Empire forced Slavic lands to accept German settlers, the EU forces European nations to accept African and Muslim invaders displaced by Jewish globo-homo imperialist wars in the Middle East and North Africa. (Jews apparently want to use wars to empty the Middle East so that they can grab more territory.)

The EU project could have worked if it had remained European and respected the national rights of all European peoples. But it turned into an arm of Judeo-Globo-Homo project. As such, it went from a sunny project of uniting and preserving Europe to a stormy project uniting Europe with Africa, Muslim World, and South Asia. It came to be about forcing the Diversity Formula or the Demographic-Imperialist Agenda on each and every nation.

So, why did so many white people fall for this poison pill? Because Political Correctness imbues vain white people with a new kind of supremacism. If imperialist whites of the past were racial supremacists, today's whites are moral supremacists. They think they are soooooooo very goody-good and holier-than-others because they are so obedient to the Globo-Homo Agenda that demeans anything white and patriotic as 'racist' while extolling anything Diverse(usually black) as sacrosanct. So, just by mouthing sacramental platitudes about 'diversity' and 'human rights', these insufferably smug PC whites think they are superior to nationalists and patriots. But then, communists also felt morally superior by mouthing off platitudes about 'equality' and 'revolution'. Just another form of supremacism among people for whom every corner of the world must be made to cave to their dogmatically imbecile notion of right-and-wrong.