Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Commentary on "BLACKFACE HISTORY IS JEWISH HISTORY"(esp as pertaining to D.W. Griffith's THE BIRTH OF A NATION)


https://noirg.org/articles/blackface-history-is-jewish-history/

At the same moment the ADL began, a number of Jewish businessmen from the Boston area were plotting to finance the most degrading and hateful blackface movie ever made—The Birth of a Nation. The silent movie epic released in 1915 was the first movie blockbuster, smashing all box office records.

I can understand why black people would be offended by D.W Griffith's movie, but it's one of the most prophetic movies ever in American History. It is less a historical summary than a future warning. And its warnings have been validated by history. Indeed, the reason why that movie is now so denigrated and suppressed(despite Griffith's reputation as the first great movie-maker) is not because its contentions are false but because they ring truer than ever. But PC neo-victorianism vilifies and represses all-too-obvious truths, leading its minions to be triggered into hysterical fits of panic by any utterance that deviates from the Iron Bubble Narrative.

So, what does the movie tell us?

1. Naive white do-gooder elites have no idea what's really in store for them. Complacent with inherited power(that was originally hard-fought and won by years of war and conflict) or shoe-horned into privilege(by having the right connections and/or fashionable opinions) and imbued with Christian notion that all souls are goody-goody alike around the world, they believe that black is white and white is black, and all will get along if whites only try harder. In truth, blacks have different temperaments & souls and regard white good-will as a weakness to flatter and manipulate. The woman's father in the movie is a do-gooder white guy who trusts the mulatto... who later tries to rape his daughter.

2. Rise of mulatto as conduit between whites and blacks. As even well-meaning whites find total blackness a bit intimidating, they rely on the semi-white-ish mulatto as bridge. Back in the days, most mulattoes were products of white men and black women: symbols of white sexual advantage. Today, most are products of black men and white women with jungle fever: symbols of black sexual advantage. These mulattoes are Loki-like characters who have black aggression but white calculation. They use their white intellect to serve the black soul. We saw this with Barack Obama and now see other mulattoes taking over the Democratic Party(though, to be sure, mainly as shills of Zionist Supremacists). Notice that even proggy Democrats prefer mulattoes to outright blacks: Kamala Harris and Cory Booker. Mulatto serves as the butter to soften the white bread before it is devoured by the Negro. Whites are more likely to fall for mulattoes because there is something white-like about the latter, making them appear 'less threatening', as with Colin Powell and Barack Obama. Blacks rely on mulattoes as cross-over figures... though mulattoes also fool and cheat blacks as well whites. And mulattoes manipulate both sides, white and black, to accrue more advantage for themselves. In some ways, mulattoes feel as the superior race because they got white intellect(superior to black intellect) and black soul(stronger than white soul).

3. Black political corruption. While corruption is endemic all around the world, black corruption really takes the cake(and the cornbread, grits, chitlins, black-eyed peas, fried chicken, an entire bucketful). Just look what Negro politicians have done to Detroit, Baltimore, black parts of St. Louis-Milwaukee-Chicago-Oakland. Because blacks tend to be more impulsive, more egocentric, more uninhibited, and more psychopathic, they are more shameless and unrestrained in their corruption. Furthermore, because they can get off the hook so easily by screaming 'it be racist!', they know they can get away with so much. Even though the depiction of corrupt black politicians in BOAN is cartoonish and over-the-top, the state of black politics in the US(and other black run places like South Africa) isn't much different from the movie.




4. Blacks are naturally wild and savage, and if unrestrained, will revert to their jungle nature. Anti-'racists' have been attacking such 'negative' racial stereotype forever, but then, even they have been at odds with their own narrative. On the one hand, goody-good 'anti-racist' Libs say it's wrong to say stereotype blacks and say they are wilder and more prone to ugabuga. But then, they praise blacks for having natural rhythm, dancing better, singing louder, coming up with new forms of hyper-sexual music & dance, and spreading trends like bumping-and-grinding and 'twerking'. Libs get triggered when someone says blacks are more into 'let the good times roll', but they say blacks be so fuzzy-wuzzy-funky and hot-cool-badass sassy and indeed thawed and liberated lame white people from ice-cold puritanical repression.
BOAN says blacks are naturally wilder, and it has been condemned for racial stereotyping. But how do the Jewish-Liberal-controlled media depict blackness? As thug athletes, thug rappers, sex-crazed studs whose only idea is 'muh dic*', black 'biatches' who be 'twerking' and yapping about her booty(and even be named Bootisha or Assnique). Also, ever since blacks obtained total freedom to express their true nature, their culture has turned more savage and crazy. If anything, depiction of black savagery in BOAN is mild compared to what rappers and other black thugs do in culture.

5. Black men despise white males as wussy and want to hump white women. This was one of the core message of BOAN. If left unchecked, black male lust will stalk white females. We've been told that this is just racial fear and paranoia with no basis in reality. But in SOUL ON ICE, Eldridge Cleaver wrote his own Portnegro's Complaint. Just like Philip Roth the Jew said he had endless 'boings' thinking of Aryan-blonde Shikses(and Norman Mailer wrote a very porny-horny book on Marilyn Monroe as his sex goddess... who married Jewish Arthur Miller btw), Cleaver said he not only fantasized raping white women but really did it(though he didn't serve many yrs in prison even in those days). Look at FBI rape statistics, and most interracial rape in the US is almost entirely black-on-white and black-on-non-black. And much of Rap culture is about black guys and white girls with jungle fever dumping on dorky white guys. Also, Jews control pornography and promote interracial black-man-and-white-woman as the thing. From pop culture to porn culture(though two have merged considerably under Jewish cultural hegemony), the message is black guys are the real men and want white women, and white women should go with superior Negroes. So, BOAN was proved right on that account.
Where it was wrong(hopefully naive) perhaps was that white women in the movie are shown to rebuff the advances by black men at every turn. But Griffith should have known better because Jack Johnson became champion before the movie came out. Because blacks are racially-athletically superior to whites, he easily destroyed and humiliated so many white men, but what did a lot of white women do? Stick with their fallen men out of racial solidarity? No, just like French women who ran into arms of victorious Germans in WWII and Japanese women who ran into arms of US GI's after Japan's defeat, white women ran into the arms of Jack Johnson. Since then, the sports culture has been one of black guys dominating the field, white cuck athletes serving as bench-warmers, and countless white women getting knocked up by Negro athletes and thugs. The biggest name in the movies of the 90s and 2000s, Quentin Tarantino, was raised by such a mudshark. And in the 90s, madonna or mudonna's second act was that she was passed around as an inflatable sex doll by blacks in the NBA.
So, if anything, BOAN was mostly right about the sexual dynamics of black and white but didn't go far enough. If white men lose power, not only will black guys come after white women but white women will go with Negroes. It's like Poland is turning into Simon Moland. One African goes to Poland and gets to hump over 300 jungle-feverish women.

--------------------

Today, Jews denounce BOAN and speak about those 'bad old days', but have things really changed? No. Though depictions of blacks today are 'positive', the underlying assumptions about race are much the same as in BOAN. Hollywood doesn't show that all races are equal. After all, why does it promote black male and white female pairing more than white male and black female pairing? It is on the assumption of racial differences, i.e. black men are more masculine and white women are more feminine, thus implying that white women should go with superior black men. Likewise, most white/Asian pairing is white male and yellow female, suggesting that white men are manlier than yellow men, therefore yellow women should go with white men. So, interracism is just another form of 'racism'. It is not about racial equality but racial superiority. And given that most depictions of blackness in the media & entertainment are hyper-sexual, people 100 yrs after BOAN still believe that blacks have that surplus ugabuga sexual mojo. In BOAN, it as presented negatively whereas now it is presented positively, but the underlying assumptions are identical: Blacks be wild and crazy as the People of Sex. And look at sports culture. Who watches sports such as NBA, NFL, and Track & Field and comes off thinking, "Gee, race is just a social construct." No, any honest person notices BAMMAMA, or Blacks Are More Muscular And More Aggressive. Now, if that is true, what is its social implications? It means tougher blacks will intimidate, threaten, beat up, and humiliate whites in schools, streets, public places, and even home invasions. It means white men will lose pride of manhood and lose their women to black men. So, if we connect the dots, the fact that blacks dominate sports should wake white people up to the black threat. But because white people are such idolatrous dolts(or idolts), they worship black athletes as 'heroes' and 'demigods'. They worship the athletic victory of the very power(black muscle advantage) that is beating up white guys and castrating them of manhood.

Furthermore, let's not forget that racial stereotypes have always been with us. Hollywood won't make stuff like BOAN anymore because blacks are now 'sacred cows' in the West. But Jewish Hollywood made so many movies about evil 'terrorist' Muslims in the 90s and 2000s(with hardly any protest from progs and Jews who, btw, funded most of them). If anything, these movie stereotypes about Muslims were far more over-the-top than anything in BOAN. RULES OF ENGAGEMENT goes so far as to suggest that no Muslim, man-woman-or-child, is trustworthy, and when push comes to shove, they must all be mowed down to the last man-woman-and-child. No wonder then that most Americans didn't care about Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright starving 100,000s of Iraqi children to death in the 1990s. (Israel has been condemned by the world community for its imperialism and tyranny, but can anyone imagine US politicians calling for sanctions on Israel to kill 100,000s of Jewish kids? Democrats and Republicans agree that Jewish lives are more precious than Muslim lives.) Jewish Hollywood remade RED DAWN as a yellow peril fantasy of North Korea(a nation with 1/40th the economy of South Korea) invading the US. And even though Jews are among the biggest sex-slavers in the world, it made movies like TAKEN where Muslims are the main sex traffickers. Yes, Muslims have been involved in sex-grooming, but who enslaved all those Slavic women in Israel to be used a sex slaves? Jews. Hollywood won't be making a movie or TV show about that anytime soon. And consider all the delirious anti-Russia movies being cranked out by Hollywood.

Also, even though BOAN was wrong about certain facts of history, globo-homo depiction of current reality is even more surreal. According to the recent Gillette ad, it is white guys who are sexually harassing 'women of color', and it is the noble black guy who comes to the rescue of the damsels. Anyone who knows real reality that black guys are the kings of 'toxic masculinity'. Rap is black. Black men are top rapists and attackers of women. Also, given that women are into 'muh pussy' and slut pride culture, it's amusing they are ones to bitch about 'toxic' anything. We live in a world where the Jew-run media would have us believe in the Russia Collusion fantasy. That's what passes for Real News. These people who can't even get current reality right dare to condemn BOAN for not getting history correct. As the recent Covington Highschool Kids incident and Jussie Smollett 'hate hoax' anti-white defamation stunt have well-illustrated, the Jew-run media have no interest in the truth. Only in their procrustean Narrative to sustain 'white guilt' and white cuckery so that whites will go on bowing down before Jews and doing their bidding.

Interestingly enough, even though Jewish Hollywood has been peddling anti-Muslim 'terrorist' tropes forever, if you go searching for "hollywood anti-muslim propaganda", the result is usually videos about 'Trump is anti-Muslim'. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=hollywood+anti-muslim+propaganda In fact, it's difficult to find any video on Youtube that details the history of Jewish Hollywood's negative depictions of Arabs and Muslims. Jews spread anti-Muslim hatred and steered US foreign policy to destroy Muslim nations, but they are now pretending to be champion-defenders of Muslims against 'American racism and Islamophobia'. These are the very same Jews who use whore-politicians to push through anti-BDS laws that rob us of our freedom of speech and conscience. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-hollywood-values-updates-how-hollywood-s-muslim-portrayals-1483650479-htmlstory.html



Wednesday, May 2, 2018

A Response to (((Jonathan Weisman)))'s Judeo-Nazi Hegemonic Neo-Imperialism

http://www.unz.com/isteve/sailer-on-semitism-by-jonathan-weisman/

(((Jonathan Weisman))) says:

"The Jew flourishes when borders come down, when boundaries blur, when walls are destroyed, not erected…. Again, we see, national borders and walls, wherever they rise, tend to trap Jews, not liberate them."

So, why were Jews fleeing from the Nazis? Nazis broke down borders all across Europe. They could access France and the vast fields for Russia for several yrs. Hmmm, funny that open borders under Nazism were bad for Jews back then. Open Borders meant Open Season on Jews.

When Nazis were on the rise, it seems Jews were seeking sanctuary in nations with working borders against Germany.

The great irony.

Under Nazi Open Borders policy, Jews were desperately fleeing as refugees to other parts of the world.

Today, it's Zionist Hegemonic Open Borders policy, and millions of Arabs and Muslims have been uprooted by Wars for Israel and forced to flee their own homelands.
Israel certainly doesn't want Syria to regain border control and keep out foreign Jihadis. Zionists want Syria to remain invaded by foreign terrorists and US mercenary troops. US pretends to remain to fight ISIS but is really there to aid 'moderate rebels' and Kurds against the central government. Why? All because Jewish supremacists control US foreign policy and don't want Syria to recover and recoup as a rival of Israel as Lone regional superpower.

At the height of their power, Nazis were for open borders in Europe because it meant Nazi power could go ANYWHERE. Jews feared this the most. After all, Jews who fled Germany for France were praying that France defend its borders against the German pan-European empire.

The fact that Jews are now so enthusiastic about destroying borders in EU and nations like Syria is proof that they are the main imperialists and hegemonists around the world. Open Borders means invasion by Jewish Power in every corner of the globe.

Imperialists flourish with open borders because they get to invade and 'include'. China certainly includes Tibet, like Japan once included Manchuria and Taiwan.

Nationalists protect and exclude.
Imperialists invade and include.

Anti-Imperialists flourish with secure borders because they can stop invasion and forcible inclusion by the world order. Palestine as a nation would still exist if Arabs had had the means to secure their borders and stop Zionist invasion that came to include Palestine as part of Jewish Empire. Jewish immigration eventually turned into Nakba Pogroms, of which 2018 is the 70th anniversary(but we hear nothing from the Jewish-dominant media), that wiped Palestine off the map.

Jews were not always for open borders. Many Jews had hoped to remain in one city and put down roots. But they were expelled to OTHER PLACES because of ethnic conflicts. And in the case of Old Jerusalem, the Open Borders and Open Invasion Policy sure didn't do much for the Jewish kingdom-state... that was wiped off the map by the invasive-inclusive Romans just like Palestine was later wiped off the map in the 20th century. For much of history, Jewish movements weren't about free trade and opportunity but expulsion and exile.

Eventually, Jews came to appreciate Open Borders because they piggybacked on Western Imperialism. Under protection and reach of British Imperialism, Jews plied the opium trade in China that had been forced open, invaded, and carved up China along the coasts. Because Jewish power has become so synonymous with Western Imperialism(much of which was funded by Jewish capital) and now American Global hegemony(dominated by Wall Street, Harvard, Hollywood, and Pentagon), Jews seek to weaken every gentile nation to gain influence over them. When Russia was opened up to US hegemony in the 90s, it was a grand opportunity for globalist Jews to gain control of policy and totally loot the place.

Also, Iraqi, Libyan, and Syrian borders were destabilized so that Jewish-controlled Foreign Policy could invade and weaken them for the interests of Israel. But these Jews who now call for the destruction of Iranian borders as well are always telling us that we must support and protect the ethnic integrity of Israel. I smell a weasel.

Imperialists and hegemonists want Open Borders. For Jews, this means financial, military, and cultural domination of all the world through Wall Street, Hollywood, Harvard, and Pentagon. And these Jews made a pact with Third World Demographic Imperialists who seek to invade white lands and leech off white wealth. Invade-Invite policy has adherents among Third Worlders. Consider the 'gold star dad' of Hillary's campaign. "You can threaten or invade my country militarily as long as you allow us to demographically invade your country." His family had access to the West, and his son, though Muslim, fought in an anti-Muslim war for the Empire of Judea, of which the US is the Jewel in the Crown. Fareed Zakaria and Nikki Haley are big adherents of this. Bomb Syria! And Let them in.

--------------------------

Ironically, the worst thing for Jews would be for white gentiles to listen to the advice of Jews: Whites should just forgo their white identity and join with rest of humanity and fight against privilege and hierarchy?

OKAY. The main targets will be Jews. Look at UK. Labour whites have given up white identity and joined with POC(people of color) against the Power. And Jews are freaking out because they got so much of it. In the UK, white 'progressives' and socialists side with Muslim immigrants who hate, hate, and hate Jewish-Zionist Power that pushes for Wars for Israel that have already killed over a million Muslims and turned so many into refugees. Jews feign sympathy for refugees but overlook the fact millions were forced into refugee-hood by Wars for Israel.

(((Weisman))) calls other people Nazis, but he is a Judeo-Nazi. Today, Jewish supremacists are the New Nazis.
US is not a democracy but an oligarchy ruled by Judeo-Nazis. Jews hate Trump not because he's a Nazi but because many of his statements were anti-Judeo-Nazi. Trump wants good relations with Russia. In contrast, Judeo-Nazis hate Russia just like Hitler hated Russia. Hitler wanted to take over Russia and reduce Slavs into slaves. Jewish power wants to take over Russia, spread Homomania, destroy Russian churches and values, and reduce Russians into deracinated consumer-slaves of Hollywood and Porn.

Trump called for end to Wars in the Middle East during the campaign. In contrast, Jews want more Wars for Israel. Crazy Netanyahu keeps bombing Syria and wants to drag US into a war with Iran. Indeed, one thing that Jews never criticize Trump for is his intermittent saber-rattling(mostly to APPEASE Judeo-Nazis) at Russia, Syria, and Iran. Judeo-Nazis want Trump to be warmongering, hostile, and chauvinist against any people or nation hated by Jews. After all, what is most of media but Judeo-Nazi hate campaign and propaganda against Russia, Iran, Syria, Palestinians(now gunned down at whim by Judeo-Nazis), and white gentiles.

Just ask yourself who the real nazis are. Richard Spencer or Jewish supremacists?

1. Who killed 500,000 Iraqi kids? Spencer or Jewish supremacist Albright?



2. Who guns down unarmed Palestinians who are living under apartheid in West Bank and Warsaw Ghetto-like conditions in Gaza? Spencer or the Judeo-Nazis of the IDF?



3. Who financially raped Russia in the 90s and reduced so many Slavic women as sex slaves in a vast white slavery ring? Spencer or Jewish globalists?

https://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/06/marc-rich.html

https://www.timesofisrael.com/thousands-of-slaves-in-israel-global-study-finds/

4. Who used Wall Street to rape Main Street in the bubble speculations under Clinton and Bush? Spencer or Jewish finance-capitalists?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405

5. Who made all those Hollywood movies that dehumanized Arabs and Muslims as subhuman terrorists? Spencer or Jewish moguls?



6. Who keeps agitating for more hate, fear, paranoia, and hostility against Russia? Spencer or Jewish hegemonists?





7. Who recruited Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to pull off a Coup? Spencer or Jewish neo-imperialists?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mess-that-nuland-made-the-consequences-of-ukraines-regime-change/5462392

8. Who says Israel can have 200 nukes and receive endless aid from US while Iran is constantly threatened even though it has no nukes and allows inspections? Spencer or Jewish warmongers?



9. Who controls entertainment and pornified mainstream culture to the extent that your average girl in the US is raised to be a mindless slut consumer pig? Spencer or Jewish producers?

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/05/05/mind-pollution-the-promotion-of-sexual-perversion-on-national-tv-the-case-of-jenji-kohan/

10. Who controls Big Pharma that addicted so many white Americans to opoids just like David Sassoon the Jews addicted so many Chinese to opium? Spencer or Jewish oligarchs?

https://www.change.org/p/hold-the-sackler-family-and-purdue-pharma-accountable-for-the-opioid-crisis

11. Who monopolizes media and platforms and uses censorship and repression to control the flow of information because they cannot win a fair debate? Spence or Jewish tyrants?



12. Who holds AIPAC Nuremberg-like rallies to buy off whore gentile politicians to support Jewish supremacists interests over Palestinian national liberation aspirations in the Jewish-Palestinian conflict? Spencer or Jewish chauvinists? If Jews really are for equality, how come NYT won't hire Palestinian-American columnists? How come Jews insist that the US favor Jews over Palestinians just like Nazis favored 'Aryans' over Slavs?



It seems to me the real nazis of today are Judeo-Nazis. (((Weisman))) is just projecting his supremacist-imperialist-hegemonism on Trump and Spencer and other whites who want to respect the national sovereignty of other nations, serve their own national interest, and find ways for the world to get along on the basis that fences make for good neighbors.
Jews who are in neo-imperialist mode hate this for the same reason Hitler hated borders that prevented him access to other lands that he wanted to control for the sake of German supremacism. The real enemy of all of humanity is Judeo-Nazism.

Anyway, Weissman is to be thanked for letting the cat, or weasel, out of the bag.
He made it so plain as day what it’s all about.

-----------------------------

Weisman:

The borders were still blurred. Nationalism and chauvinism were in check. Undocumented immigrants marched in the streets of Washington and Los Angeles demanding rights. The polyglot nation recovered…. The Jew thrived.


Jews are what percentage of the world population? Yet, all the world must be turned upside down with mass invasion(of course Israel gets Passover rights) just to profiteth the Tribe?

Of course, Weisman's formula applies ONLY AS LONG AS Jews can play non-whites against whites in the game of Divide-and-Rule.
But what would happen if indeed ALL whites did go SJW? Then, they would side with POC against Zionism and Jewish privilege. BDS is spreading among SJW whites like wildfire.

So, it's a kind of paradox. In order for Jewish divide-and-rule strategy to work, there must always be 'racist' whites. If whites were to all lose their 'racism' and mix with POC and just become a polyglot people, they could all turn SJW. Then, Jews won't be able to play divide-and-rule among 'racist' whites and non-whites. The polyglot of POC and SJW whites will come after Jews... like the British Labour Party is a mix of Whites-gone-SJW teaming up with Muslims and Africans against Jewish power.

Also, it is the 'racist' whites who are most supportive of Israel as 'western outpost' in the Middle East. It is precisely because white conservatives have been tainted with 'white guilt' that they cling to Israel First to show that they'd been redeemed from 'antisemitism' and 'racism'. It's their get-out-of-white-guilt-jail card to prove that they are no longer 'racist' when, in fact, they still cling to whiteness, even if in an implicit way.

But if white conservatives really did lose their 'racism' and decided to become SJW, they'd no longer need to cling to Israel or profusely flatter Jews for moral credit. They could just hug Diversity to get all the moral cred they need.
Indeed, this is why proggy whites aren't so pro-Israel. As they are pro-POC, they don't need to hug Jews and Israel to be 'redeemed'. Just by screaming BLM or championing 'dreamers', their 'white guilt' gets cleansed.

In contrast, because white conservatives tends to be less charitable to blacks and browns, their 'white guilt' washing station remains Israel First. But if white conservatives were to drop their racial interests and embrace blacks, browns, and POC, then there would no longer be a need for them to worship Israel to ritual-cleansing of 'white guilt' as it would be washed constantly by their support of POC such as Muslims and Palestinians.